Splendido at Rancho Vistoso
Tucson, Arizona · CCN 035273
12 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 48
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 42
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MATHER SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES
- County
- Pima
- Medicare-certified since
- 2008
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 24 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Arizona.
Last survey on record
Jul 24, 2026
108 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.97 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.55 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 18.2% | 48.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,018 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G15.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1050.0% | E840.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B15.0% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Splendido at Rancho Vistoso, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 10, 2024
Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of facility policies and the State Agency (SA) complaint tracking system, the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as identified by the comprehensive care plan, resulting in the resident #1's fall with injury. The deficient practice could result in increased risk of injury to the resident. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, degenerative disease of nervous system and repeated falls. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a staff assessment for mental status indicating resident #1 had a memory problem with both short-term memory and long-term memory. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jul 24, 2026
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that staff knocked prior to entering the rooms of 4 residents (#11, #3, #13 and #29). The deficient practice could impact the resident's level of privacy and their psychosocial well-being.Findings include:-Regarding Resident #29:Resident #29 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder-recurrent, anxiety disorder, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, shortness of breath, atrial fibrillation, use of anticoagulants, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness.The annual MDS (minimum data set) dated May 22, 2026 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating that the… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jul 24, 2026
Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were updated, care plan conferences were conducted, and care plans were revised to reflect residents' current needs for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#11, #17, and #33). The deficient practice had the potential to result in residents and/or their representatives not participating in the development and review of the plan of care, not understanding the resident's current care needs and goals, and staff providing care that was not based on an accurate, current, and individualized care plan. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF727Jul 24, 2026
Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to provide services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The census was 38. The deficient practice could result in resident not provided with advanced care activities to meet their needs.Findings Include:The Facility Assessment with completion date of February 7, 2026 revealed an average daily census range of 28-35 for long-term care and 2-7 for short stay. Staffing plan included one FT (full-time) Director of Nursing (DON), 1-3 Licensed nurses providing direct care, and other nursing personnel with administrative duties that would include the lead nurse, minimum data set (MDS), assistant director of nursing (ADON), and Medical Records. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Jul 24, 2026
Based on observations, clinical record reviews, staff interviews and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired items readily available for resident use; failed to ensure that that medications were not left at bedside during medication administration; and, failed to provide for safe and secure storage for medication for two residents (#29, #1). The deficient practice could result in placing residents at risk for medication errors, unauthorized access, and potential adverse health outcomes. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 48 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 24, 2026Standard9 findings
- Jun 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 28, 2025Standard3 findings
- Sep 10, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 6, 2023Standard2 findings
- Aug 25, 2022Standard4 findings
- Mar 18, 2021Standard4 findings
- Feb 21, 2019Standard5 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Sep 16, 2015Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 24, 2013—5 findings
- Jan 26, 2012—3 findings
- Dec 9, 2010—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction