Deficiency Index

Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing

Spanish Fork, Utah · CCN 465183

11 surveys since 2014, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
69
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2014–2025
’14’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
45
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL
County
Utah
Medicare-certified since
2015

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 24, 2025

350 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.744.20
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.62—
Annual nurse turnover69.6%57.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$47,509 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG220.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD550.0%E330.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 69 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6021×

    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

  • F6101×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6851×

    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 24, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 1 of 16 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, the resident sustained four falls with no new interventions implemented and one of those falls resulted in a head laceration that required ten staples. This was identified at a Harm level. Resident identifier: 4.Findings included:Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Huntington's disease, aphasia, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur.On 11/18/25 at 10:26 AM, resident 4's door was observed to be closed, and no noises could be heard from the… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Oct 5, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 21 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure each residenthas the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Specifically, a resident fell and experienced a head laceration and broken ribs after not being checked on for an extended period of time. This resulted in a finding of HARM. Resident identifier: 35. Findings included: HARM Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemipareses and hemiplegia of left non-dominant side, lack of coordination, dysphagia, type II diabetes, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension and Crohn's disease. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Nov 24, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the food was not served in a sanitary manner and open spices were not dated. Findings included:On 11/24/25 during the tray line of lunch service the following was observed:a. At 11:55 AM, the [NAME] was observed to don gloves and was then observed to push a metal cart out of the way and then pull it back into position with a gloved left hand. The [NAME] was then observed to plate the lunch meal and use the dirty gloved left hand to touch the food as it was placed onto the plate.b. At 11:57 AM, the [NAME] was observed to use a washcloth to wipe off the cutting board near the tray line. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610Oct 5, 2023

    Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 21 sampled residents, that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. Specifically, allegations of physical, sexual, and verbal abuse were not thoroughly investigated to determine if abuse occurred. Resident identifiers: 24, 31, 35 and 94. Findings include: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking not elsewhere classified, dysphagia unspecified, multiple sclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications,… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF886Nov 10, 2021

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not conduct COVID-19 testing based on the criteria for conducting testing of asymptomatic individuals, such as the positivity rate of COVID-19 in a county. Specifically, unvaccinated staff were not tested twice a week when the county positivity rate was High >10%). This occurred for 2 out of 5 sampled staff members. Findings include: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Memo QSO (Quality Safety & Oversight)-20-38-NH, revised on 4/27/21, reads, Routine testing of unvaccinated staff should be based on the extent of the virus in the community. Fully vaccinated staff do not have to be routinely tested . Facilities should use their county positivity rate in the prior week as the trigger for staff testing frequency. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 69 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 24, 2025Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 5, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 10, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Mar 25, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Aug 1, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Mar 29, 2017Standard9 findings · 1 harm
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Dec 17, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Sep 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 23, 2014Standard and complaint27 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction