Deficiency Index

Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center

Tulsa, Oklahoma · CCN 375172

28 surveys since 2011, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
200
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
16
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
106
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Tulsa
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Oklahoma.

Last survey on record

Jul 10, 2025

487 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.853.68
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.20—
Annual nurse turnover84.8%54.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$15,766 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.5%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD522.7%E1568.2%F14.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 22 of the 200 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

  • F6021×

    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 15, 2025

    1. On 04/21/25, a past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to supervise residents with exit seeking behaviors. On 04/14/25 Resident #14 was observed to leave the courtyard by a resident, from an unlocked gate, staff were notified and were able to redirect Resident #14 back into the building. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision for 1 (#14) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for exit seeking behaviors. The DON identified 66 residents resided at the facility. Findings: An elopement evaluation, dated 03/27/25, showed Resident #14 was at risk for elopement. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF659Jul 3, 2026

    Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure only licensed qualified staff replaced a resident's indwelling urinary catheter for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters. Specifically, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #2, under the direct supervision of Registered Nurse (RN) #1, attempted to replace Resident #26's indwelling urinary catheter. As a result, Resident #26 experienced pain, bleeding from the insertion site, and bloody urine with clots.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Catheter Care, with a copyright date of 2024, indicated, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 3, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, facility document review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #91) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 04/01/2026, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19 turned Resident #91 in bed by herself instead of utilizing two people as per the resident's care plan, which resulted in Resident #91 hitting their head on the wall, causing injury.Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Accident Prevention & [and] Hazard Mitigation, indicated, the Purpose & Objective was To establish operational guidelines that maintain a resident environment as free from accident hazards as is reasonably practicable, and to provide individualized supervision and… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF690Jul 3, 2026

    Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #2, an unlicensed staff member, replaced Resident #26's indwelling urinary catheter while under the direct supervision of Registered Nurse (RN) #1. CMA #2 inserted the indwelling urinary catheter into Resident #26 and inflated the catheter balloon prior to seeing a return of urine. RN #1 then took over the insertion of Resident #26's indwelling urinary catheter procedure, deflated the balloon, repositioned the catheter, and reinflated the balloon, with no observed return of urine. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Jul 3, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure refuse was properly contained in dumpsters and failed to ensure outside dumpster lids and side accessibility sliders were operational and remained closed to reduce the potential for harboring insects or rodents for 2 of 2 dumpsters observed. The failures had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility.Findings included: A facility policy titled, General Refuse, Trash & Dumpster Management, effective 03/03/2026, revealed, 3. Outside Dumpster Area Operational Standards, which revealed, The physical dumpster containers and surrounding enclosures must be maintained in accordance with the following criteria, which included 1. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 200 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 3, 2026Standard8 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • May 15, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 26, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Nov 1, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Apr 25, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Sep 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2021Infection control6 findings
  • Dec 5, 2019Standard13 findings
  • May 30, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 24, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 5, 2019Standard and complaint24 findings
  • Jun 6, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 10, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Jan 31, 2017Standard13 findings
  • Jun 16, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 8, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 10, 2015Standard20 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 5, 2014Complaint6 findings
  • Sep 12, 2014Standard20 findings
  • Dec 19, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 1, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2013—11 findings
  • Aug 2, 2012—2 findings
  • May 18, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 3, 2011—29 findings · 9 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction