Southbrook Healthcare Center
Springfield, Ohio · CCN 365424
25 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 87
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 98
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- COMMUNICARE HEALTH
- County
- Clark
- Medicare-certified since
- 1979
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Apr 17, 2026
206 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.15 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 31.0% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $18,470 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2777.1% | E25.7% | F411.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7582×
Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Southbrook Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 28, 2022
Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of fall investigations, staff interviews, guardian interview, and review of facility policy for falls and nurse aide rounds, the facility failed to assess the root cause of falls, failed to identify trends and patterns of falls, failed to assess the appropriateness of added fall interventions, failed to care plan fall interventions, and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #02 had eight falls in six weeks which resulted in a fractured pelvis on 06/17/22, fractured ribs on 06/24/22, and a fall on 07/21/22 where she was found face down on the floor bleeding, was sent to the local hospital where she was subsequently transferred to a level one trauma hospital… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 17, 2026
THE FOLLOWING SURVEY FINDINGS PERTAIN TO INCIDENCE OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for residents. This resulted in Actual Harm on 03/06/26 when Resident #12 rolled out of bed onto the floor during incontinence care, resulting in a fracture to his clavicle. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 01/29/26 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, cerebral infarction, and type two diabetes. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 27, 2025
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of online guidelines per the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess resident skin and failed to identify pressure ulcers until they had reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #54 who was admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer to his sacrum, left scapula, and right scapula and developed an additional pressure ulcer to his right gluteal fold which was not identified until it had developed into an unstageable ulcer with slough (nonviable tissue which could impede wound healing) and necrotic (dead) tissue. This affected one (Resident # 54) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF730May 27, 2025
Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure annual evaluations were completed for staff. This had the potential to affect all of the residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #120 revealed a hire date of 10/27/22 with no annual evaluation. Review of the personnel file for CNA #128 revealed a hire date of 08/15/23 with no annual evaluation. Review of the personnel file for CNA #117 revealed a hire date of 07/19/22 with no annual evaluation. Interview on 05/21/25 at 10:09 A.M. with Human Resource Manager (HRM) #153 confirmed annual evaluations were not completed for CNAs #120, #128, and #117.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 27, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility excluding Resident #52 and #62 who did not eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Observation on 05/18/25 from 08:22 A.M. to 8:52 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #201 revealed the following findings in the kitchen: -The dry storage area contained eleven undated cereal bowls, one container of breadcrumbs open to air, four clear plastic containers of cereal with cloudy sides and residue buildup, one clear plastic container of sugar with cloudy sides, one clear plastic container of flour with cloudy sides, one clear… […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 87 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 4, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Apr 17, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 27, 2025Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 18, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Sep 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Nov 17, 2022Standard10 findings
- Sep 28, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 14, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Dec 19, 2019Standard7 findings
- Jan 15, 2019Complaint6 findings
- Oct 25, 2018Standard6 findings
- Jan 3, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 6, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Aug 17, 2017Standard1 finding
- May 26, 2016Standard3 findings
- Dec 19, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Feb 6, 2014—2 findings
- Oct 26, 2012—4 findings
- Jan 27, 2012—3 findings
- Jul 22, 2011—8 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 7, 2011—2 findings
- Apr 7, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction