Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care
Smithtown, New York · CCN 335756
14 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 49
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 162
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP
- County
- Suffolk
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 259 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.
Last survey on record
Jan 23, 2026
290 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.51 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.54 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 34.7% | 33.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D17100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5831×
Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
- F6411×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Jan 23, 2026
Based on observation, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Intake ID: 2682221) initiated on 01/21/2026, the facility did not ensure that the designated representative was notified when the need to discontinue a treatment was identified. This was identified for one (1) resident (Resident #3) of three (3) residents reviewed for Notification of Change. Specifically, Resident #3's two half siderails were removed without notification to designated representative as required. Based on observation, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Intake ID: 2682221) initiated on 01/21/2026, the facility did not ensure that the designated representative was notified when the need to discontinue a treatment was identified. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Jan 23, 2026
Based on record review and interviews during the Abbreviated Survey initiated on 01/21/2026, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment was completed accurately and reflected each resident's status. This was identified for one (1) resident (Resident #2) of three (3) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #2's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #2's functional ability as needing substantial/maximal assistance with putting on and taking off footwear. Resident #2 had bilateral (both sides) above the knee amputations and did not utilize footwear. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jan 23, 2026
Based on observation, Record review, and staff interviews during the Abbreviated Survey (Intake ID: 2682221) initiated on 01/21/2026, the facility did not ensure that each resident's Comprehensive Care Plan was revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment to reflect the resident's current status. This was identified for one (1) resident (Resident #2) of three (3) residents reviewed for Siderails. Specifically, Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan was not revised to reflect the discontinuation of the residents siderails.Based on observation, Record review, and staff interviews during the Abbreviated Survey (Intake ID: 2682221) initiated on 01/21/2026, the facility did not ensure that each resident's Comprehensive Care Plan was revised by the interdisciplinary team after each… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF554Apr 29, 2025
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/23/2025 and completed on 4/29/2025, the facility did not ensure the right to self-administer medications. This was identified for one (Resident #30) of two residents reviewed for Skin Condition. Specifically, Resident #30 was self-administering their eyedrop medications by themselves. The resident was not assessed by the Interdisciplinary team and did not have a physician's order to self-administer their medications. The finding is: The facility's Self Administration of Medications policy and procedure, revised in January 2025, documented to permit bedside medications for residents when ordered by the Attending Physician. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Apr 29, 2025
Based on record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 4/23/2025 and completed on 4/29/2025, the facility did not ensure that accurate Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental disorder was accurately completed. This was identified for two (Resident #32 and #74) of 30 residents reviewed for the Pre-Admission Screen review. Specifically, Resident #32 and Resident #74 did not have a completed Level I Screen, Additionally, the screen did not accurately indicate the diagnosis of Dementia for both residents. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Pre-Admission Screen Annual Resident Review (PASARR), updated on 1/20/2025, documented the Pre-Admission process includes established criteria to determine admission eligibility. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 49 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 23, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Apr 29, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
- Feb 27, 2024Standard2 findings
- Apr 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2022Standard4 findings
- Mar 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Aug 2, 2019Standard1 finding
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Feb 28, 2018Standard4 findings
- Dec 7, 2015Standard7 findings
- Dec 16, 2014Standard2 findings
- Nov 20, 2013—6 findings
- Nov 16, 2012—4 findings
- Nov 2, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great NeckGreat Neckno harm findings
- Dry Harbor Nursing HomeMiddle Villageno harm findings
- Meadowbrook HealthcarePlattsburghno harm findings
- Throgs Neck Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterBronxno harm findings
- Sands Point Center for Health and RehabilitationPort Washingtonno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction