Deficiency Index

Smith Village

Chicago, Illinois · CCN 145904

33 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
74
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
13
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse13

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
78
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
Independent
County
Cook
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 31 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Illinois.

Last survey on record

May 16, 2026

177 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.274.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.12—
Annual nurse turnover57.3%36.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$16,350 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG521.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD521.7%E939.1%F417.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 74 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Smith Village, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF627May 16, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate discharge for one resident reviewed for discharge practices by discharging the resident despite abnormal laboratory results indicative of dehydration. This deficient practice affected one (R1) of two residents reviewed for discharge. As a result, R1 was readmitted to the hospital within 48 hours of discharge with diagnoses of acute metabolic encephalopathy, likely secondary to a combination of dementia, dehydration, and urinary tract infection (UTI).Failure to ensure the resident was medically stable prior to discharge had the potential to result in worsening dehydration, delayed medical treatment, increased risk for hospitalization, and adverse health outcomes related to unresolved clinical conditions.R1… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF602Jan 21, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse protocol for one resident (R1) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in an employee cashing several of R1's personal checks without his knowledge/permission. Findings Include:R1's 7/26/2025, 19:12 admission Details reads: Arrived by other. admission mode: wheelchair. Living situation prior to admission: Other residential facility / assisted living / group home. Mental Status: Alert & Oriented x3, communicated verbally, speech is clear, is able to understand and be understood when speaking.R1's 9/4/2025 18:26 Health Status Note Text reads: Resident actively transitioning. Family visiting through shift. Hospice RN made aware and was coming to facility. Resident resting in bed. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 13, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that proper number of staff were used in transferring one of four residents (R1) to prevent accidental hazard in the sample who requires two persons assist in transfers from chair to bed or bed to chair. This failure affected R1 who was transferred from chair to bed by one staff instead of two. As a result, R1 sustained laceration of left lower leg, was sent to the hospital and the laceration required eighteen (18) sutures to be repaired. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF909Feb 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the bed frame is locked to the size of the mattress for the safety of one resident (R1) reviewed for injury. As a result, R1's left lower leg made contact with the loose bed frame during transfer into bed causing a laceration. R1 was sent to the hospital and the laceration was repaired with 18 sutures. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R1's medical record Admission Record showed that R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and latest admitted was 08/26/24 with diagnosis list that includes but not limited to Unspecified intracapsular fracture of the left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, aftercare… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 7, 2024

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 confused resident [R1] who is a high fall risk out of 3 [R1, R2, R3] residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R1 being found on the bathroom floor bleeding to the back of the head. R1 was transferred to the hospital and R1 received laceration repair with staples. Findings Include: R1's clinical record indicates in part the following: R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting medical diagnosis include but not limited to- right closed femur fracture, abnormal gait and mobility, weakness, cerebral infarction, aphasia following cerebral infarction, traumatic hemorrhage cerebral without the loss of consciousness, muscle wasting and atrophy, dementia… […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 74 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 16, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 21, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 26, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Feb 13, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 19, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Apr 7, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2023Standard5 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Aug 23, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 8, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 15, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 24, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 3, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 21, 2022Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Jan 11, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 19, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 3, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Dec 6, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 13, 2017Standard1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 17, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Oct 9, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Apr 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 14, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 13, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 27, 2012—3 findings
  • Oct 7, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction