Signature Healthcare of Rogersville
Rogersville, Tennessee · CCN 445359
10 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 29
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 150
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Hawkins
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 8, 2022
1,523 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.40 | 3.56 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.80 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.9% | 48.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Signature Healthcare of Rogersville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Sep 8, 2022
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical information was not visible for 1 resident (Resident #49) of 71 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 8/16/2018, showed .All residents have the right to be treated with respect and dignity. These rights will be promoted and protected by the facility . Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident #49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 0 indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Sep 8, 2022
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 resident (#53) of 18 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, last revised [DATE], showed The care plan will include how the facility will assist the resident to meet their needs, goals and preferences .Reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals .Care plans are ongoing and revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change .The care plan should reflect the current status of the resident and be updated with changes in the residents [resident's] status . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 29 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 8, 2022Standard2 findings
- Aug 20, 2019Standard1 finding
- May 8, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Aug 15, 2018Standard2 findings
- Jun 14, 2017Standard2 findings
- Jul 7, 2016Standard2 findings
- Mar 26, 2014Standard7 findings
- Jan 24, 2013—2 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Jun 23, 2011—4 findings
- May 13, 2010—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction