Deficiency Index

Signature Healthcare of Rogersville

Rogersville, Tennessee · CCN 445359

10 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
29
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2022
’10’15’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
150
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
County
Hawkins
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 8, 2022

1,523 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.403.56
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.80—
Annual nurse turnover42.9%48.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 29 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Signature Healthcare of Rogersville, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Sep 8, 2022

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical information was not visible for 1 resident (Resident #49) of 71 residents reviewed for dignity. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 8/16/2018, showed .All residents have the right to be treated with respect and dignity. These rights will be promoted and protected by the facility . Resident #49 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident #49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 0 indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Sep 8, 2022

    Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 resident (#53) of 18 residents reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, last revised [DATE], showed The care plan will include how the facility will assist the resident to meet their needs, goals and preferences .Reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals .Care plans are ongoing and revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change .The care plan should reflect the current status of the resident and be updated with changes in the residents [resident's] status . […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 29 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 8, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Aug 20, 2019Standard1 finding
  • May 8, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 15, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jun 14, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jul 7, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Mar 26, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Jan 24, 2013—2 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jun 23, 2011—4 findings
  • May 13, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction