Signature Healthcare of Roanoke Rapids
Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina · CCN 345336
27 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 105
- Surveys
- 27
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 108
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Halifax · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 125 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
May 7, 2026
186 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.25 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 66.7% | 49.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $9,110 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1250.0% | E833.3% | F14.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B28.3% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F6371×
Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
- F6441×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Signature Healthcare of Roanoke Rapids, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Mar 4, 2021
Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and physician interviews, the facility failed to provide a comprehensive approach to pressure ulcers as evidenced by lack of assessments, lack of documentation, and lack of treatments for 1 or 3 residents reviewed for care and services for pressure ulcers. Resident # 1 was admitted on [DATE] with no skin breakdown and was identified on 1/19/21 with an unstageable pressure ulcer to the coccyx, and on 1/20/21 a deep tissue injury to the left heel, left posterior ankle, and left plantar foot. Immediate Jeopardy began on 1/8/2021 a nurse aide identified an open area on the sacral area and a nurse did not perform a complete assessment until 1/19/21, and at that time it was unstageable. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF925Aug 25, 2022
Based on record review, facility staff, Emergency Department Physician's Assistant, Outpatient Clinic Nurse, [CONDITION(S)] Nurse Manager, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to control the presence of flies in the facility resulting in a maggot infestation of a resident's wound for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #263) reviewed for wound care. On 7/30/22 Resident #263's left lower leg wound was infested with maggots. She presented to the emergency department with approximately 60-65 maggots in her left lower extremity wound. […]
- Actual harm, patternF725Mar 4, 2021
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure wound care treatments were performed as ordered by a physician for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure sores. The facility also failed to provide sufficient staff to ensure an assessment was completed, blood sugars were monitored as ordered, and medical attention was sought for a change in condition for 1 (Resident #9) of 3 residents reviewed for the provision of care according to professional standards. Findings included: 1. A physician's orders [REDACTED].#1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 1, 2025
Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and nurse consultant interview, the facility failed to perform a transfer from the wheelchair to the bed according to the care plan for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Resident #1 sustained a left leg fracture above the knee with extreme pain requiring a visit to the emergency room at the hospital after being transferred without a mechanical lift. Findings included: Resident #1 had resided in the facility since 7/17/2019 and had multiple diagnoses some of which included cerebral vascular accident, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Jun 18, 2021
Based on observation, record review, physician and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to administer scheduled pain medication every 4 hours to control a resident's pain for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management (Resident #41). The findings included: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (Quarterly) dated 4/16/21 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, ambulation, dressing and personal hygiene and total assistance with toileting. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 105 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 7, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
- Mar 26, 2026Complaint4 findings
- Mar 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 3, 2025Complaint2 findings
- May 1, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 8, 2025Standard10 findings
- Nov 9, 2023Standard3 findings
- Dec 15, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
- Aug 25, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 18, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 4, 2021Complaint5 findings · 3 harm
- Jan 27, 2021Complaint8 findings
- Sep 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 25, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Oct 2, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
- Sep 27, 2018Standard and complaint6 findings
- Sep 28, 2017Standard and complaint2 findings
- Oct 19, 2016Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jul 26, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 3, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jan 9, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jun 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Dec 12, 2013—2 findings
- Oct 4, 2012—1 finding
- Sep 22, 2011—3 findings
- Oct 21, 2010—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham7 harm findings
- NC State Veterans Home - Black MountainBlack Mountain5 harm findings
- Pisgah Manor Health Care CenterCandler5 harm findings
- Magnolia Gardens Center for Nursing and RehabilitaThomasville2 harm findings
- Lexington Health Care CenterLexington5 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction