Deficiency Index

Signature Healthcare of Glasgow Rehab & Wellness C

Glasgow, Kentucky · CCN 185340

21 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
80
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse6

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
68
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
County
Barren · rural
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 24, 2021

1,872 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.883.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.00—
Annual nurse turnover55.7%45.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD360.0%E120.0%F120.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 80 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Signature Healthcare of Glasgow Rehab & Wellness C, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The failure had the potential to affect all residents who consumed meals from the kitchen.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary Services, revised 02/15/2024, revealed the facility was to utilize best practices guidelines in matters pertaining to dietary and nutrition. Further review revealed the facility was to work with the dietary department, Registered Dietician, Physician, and the contracted dietary provider in determining the best practices and each resident's individual needs. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Sep 24, 2021

    Based on interviews and document reviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified food and nutrition director with appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out food and nutrition services The facility failed to ensure the Director for Food and Nutrition Services was a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), a Certified Food Service Manager, had a national certification for food service management, or had an associates or higher degree in food service management. This could affect all residents who receive meals from the kitchen. Facility census of sixty-one (61) residents. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Sep 24, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to label and date one (1) vial of [MEDICATION(S)] and failed to dispose of a medication after the dispose-of date in one (1) of two (2) medication rooms (Grace Hall). The facility also failed to dispose of a liquid protein supplement sixty (60) days after opening on one (1) of five (5) medication carts (Oak Lawn 1). Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration General Guideline, reviewed 09/2018, indicated, expiration dates should be checked on packages/containers and no expired medications should be given to a resident. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF583Jul 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the protection of private personal information for for 1 of 1 residents, sampled during medication administration, out of the total sample of 13 residents, (Resident (R)37). Registered Nurse (RN) 2 walked away from the medication cart leaving the computer screen, with R37's information on it, opened and unattended.The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 06/24/2024, revealed staff were to provide for (residents') privacy as appropriate during medication administration.Review of the facility policy titled, Electronic Medical Records, revised 01/31/2025, revealed the facility was to make reasonable efforts to limit the use or disclosure of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Jul 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications and medication-related products were stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 medication carts inspected during the State Survey Agency (SSA) survey, which had the potential to affect residents receiving medications from that cart.The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, revised 06/24/2024, revealed staff were to check the expiration dates on packages or containers. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 80 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 9, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Sep 24, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Oct 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 20, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Mar 2, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Feb 8, 2017Complaint8 findings · 6 harm
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Feb 25, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Oct 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 19, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 18, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 11, 2013—2 findings
  • Jan 4, 2013—9 findings
  • Jul 27, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 20, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 12, 2012—2 findings
  • Sep 30, 2011—12 findings
  • Jun 15, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction