Signature Healthcare of Clarksville
Clarksville, Tennessee · CCN 445448
13 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 60
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Montgomery
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 28, 2025
530 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.88 | 3.58 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.83 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 76.0% | 48.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $63,105 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J114.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D685.7% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Signature Healthcare of Clarksville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 28, 2025
Based on policy review, fall investigation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure environment for 5 of 7 (Resident #31, #50, #248, #498 and #501) sampled residents reviewed for falls and accidents. The facility failed to ensure processes were implemented to provide supervision and assistance to ensure the residents' environment was free of accident hazards. The facility failed to conduct thorough fall investigations to identify all contributing factors (root causes) and failed to implement appropriate interventions to ensure resident safety. Resident #498 was admitted on [DATE] and had 13 falls from [DATE] through [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655May 26, 2023
Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate Baseline Care Plan for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed with Baseline Care Plans. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Baseline Care Plan Policy, effective date 9/23/2022, revealed .Complete a Baseline Care Plan to promote continuity of care and communication among nursing home stakeholders, increase resident safety, and safeguard against adverse events that are most likely to occur right after admission .Baseline Care Plan will be working tool for the first 48 hours . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656May 26, 2023
Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate and revised Comprehensive Care Plan for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed with Comprehensive Care Plans. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, effective date 4/6/2015 and revised 7/19/2018, revealed .A person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan that includes a measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF694May 26, 2023
Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Infusion therapy, medication administration, and obtain Physicians Orders for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1, #3 and #4) with a PICC line. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Vascular Access Devices and Infusion Therapy Procedures Maintaining Patency of Peripheral and Central Vascular Access Devices IV [Intravascular] Flush Policy and Procedure, dated 2011, revealed .Purpose to maintain the patency of all peripheral and central vascular access devices [VADs] .Vascular access devices are flushed after each infusion to clear the infused medication from the catheter lumen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550May 28, 2025
Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to promote dignity for 1 of 5 (Resident #36) sampled residents reviewed for activity of daily living (ADL) care when they failed to provide hair care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 1/31/25, revealed .All residents have the right to be treated with respect and dignity. These rights will be promoted and protected by the facility .All residents will be treated in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance and enhancement of quality of life. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 60 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 28, 2025Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- May 26, 2023Complaint5 findings
- Oct 11, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Aug 12, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jan 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Sep 6, 2019Standard1 finding
- Oct 18, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Aug 4, 2016Standard1 finding
- Jul 9, 2015Standard5 findings
- Apr 15, 2014Standard and complaint10 findings
- Dec 6, 2012—4 findings
- Sep 14, 2011—15 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction