Sherrill House
Boston, Massachusetts · CCN 225201
18 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 66
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 196
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Suffolk
- Medicare-certified since
- 1971
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 36 not-for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Apr 10, 2026
213 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.66 | 3.89 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.68 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.5% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $35,860 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G26.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2477.4% | E516.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6553×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sherrill House, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 10, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment, services, or interventions to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing a.) ensure treatment orders were transcribed and implemented per the Wound Nurse Practitioner's recommendations and b.) accurately implement a wound intervention of an air mattress for four Residents (#152, #32 , #4, and #5) out of a total sample of 33 residents. 1.For Resident #152, the facility failed to prevent an existing ankle wound that was present on admission to the facility from worsening from a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss- shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed) pressure ulcer to a Stage 4 (full-thickness tissue loss- exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) pressure ulcer by not… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Apr 10, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that effective pain management that was consistent with professional standards of practice was provided for one Resident (#4) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide interventions for pain management during wound care treatment, resulting in the Resident experiencing pain during the wound care.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Pain-Clinical Protocol' dated March 2018, indicated the following but not limited to:-The physician and staff will identify individuals who have pain or who are at risk for having pain. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Apr 10, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards for 3 Residents (#146, #42, and #134), out of 33 total sampled residents. Specifically,1.) For Resident #146, the facility failed to notify the provider and obtain and implement Bumex (a diuretic medication) for a weight gain as ordered by the physician.2.) For Resident #42, the facility failed to (2a.) implement a functioning air mattress physician's order, (2b.) complete a wound treatment and dressing documentation in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR).3.) For Resident #134, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained according to the physician's orders. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Apr 10, 2026
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal requirements in two out of four medication carts observed. Specifically,1.) The facility failed to ensure medications with shortened expiry dates were dated once opened, according to manufacturer's guidelines.2.) The facility failed to ensure medications were stored in the original, labeled containers. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Medication Storage', revised April 2019, indicated:- Drugs and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received.- The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner.-… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jan 16, 2025
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified experience for the residents of the facility by 1) failing to provide a dignified dining experience for the residents on the first floor unit, 2) ensuring a staff member was not on the phone while providing care for one Resident (#129) and 3) ensuring staff members were not storing person items in the room of one Resident (#38), out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Life - Dignity, dated 2001, indicated the following: -Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. -Residents should be treated with dignity and respect at all times. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 66 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 10, 2026Standard9 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 24, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 7, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Mar 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 23, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jan 16, 2025Standard11 findings
- Jan 25, 2024Standard4 findings
- Oct 27, 2022Standard5 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Oct 6, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 28, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 21, 2019Standard6 findings
- Jan 23, 2018Standard7 findings
- Dec 21, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jun 10, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2013—4 findings · 2 harm
- May 8, 2012—2 findings
- Sep 1, 2011—3 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 7, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction