Seneca District Hospital D/P SNF
Chester, California · CCN 555022
21 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 87
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 16
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Plumas · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=18, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 12, 2025
332 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 6.07 | 6.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.76 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 48.1% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $11,408 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G214.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D535.7% | E428.6% | F214.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B17.1% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7273×
Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6091×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Seneca District Hospital D/P SNF, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF609Oct 8, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report physical and verbal abuse, and an injury of unknown origin within two hours to the state and federal entities (California Department Public Health, CDPH, the Ombudsman, [a person appointed by the government who ensures that residents are treated fairly and that their rights are protected], and the Sheriff's office) for two of two residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for abuse, when:1. On 10/1/25 at 9:30 pm, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 witnessed CNA 2 roughly turning, slapping and holding down Resident 1's hands and arms and causing a skin tear to Resident 1's left wrist during patient care. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Dec 12, 2025
Based on interview and record review, this requirement was not met when the facility failed to obtain the services of a registered nurse for eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. This had the potential to adversely affect residents' care, which could lead to potential negative clinical outcomes.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/10/25 at 8:29 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), of the facility's Registered Nurse (RN) staffing/schedule documentation from the period of 4/1/25 to 4/30/25 and 5/1/25 to 5/31/25 the documentation indicated that no RN was scheduled to work 4/16/25, 4/17/25, 4/18/25, and 5/26/25 when the DON was off. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF600Jun 4, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect twelve (12) of twelve (12) residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12) from abuse by a staff member when Licensed Nurse (LN) A, with willful intent, deprived residents of necessary medical care and treatment by withholding Resident one (1) through 12 ' s medications that were ordered by their Medical Doctor (MD). This occurred during the morning (am) shifts of 5/25/24 and 5/26/24. LN A was observed via video from a camera located above the nurse ' s station medication desk throwing medications in the garbage, putting medications in her scrub (uniform) pockets, and leaving some medications in drawers that were subsequently found by LN B. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 12, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control practices to prevent the transmission of infection when: 1. Staff failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and clean administration technique during the administration of eye drops to for one of 16 sample residents (Resident 8). 2. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine used by residents was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, free from contamination. These deficient practices had the potential to put the residents at risk for unwanted infections, and negatively impact their quality of life.Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Sep 5, 2025
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two residents sampled for dignity (Resident 1), was treated with dignity and respect when Houskeeper (HSK) A made comments to Resident 1 indicating he had sexy legs and a sexy face. This failure caused Resident 1 to feel uncomfortable and unsafe around HSK A. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Implementation of Patients' [NAME] of Rights dated 9/22/16, indicated Patient right number 10: to be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of his/her dignity and individuality. 1. Members of the staff will display respect when speaking with, care for, or talking about patients as constant confirmation of their individuality and dignity as human beings. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 87 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 12, 2025Standard4 findings
- Oct 8, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 7, 2024Standard3 findings
- Jun 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 14, 2023Standard2 findings
- Oct 21, 2022Standard2 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Apr 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 16, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jul 9, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Apr 25, 2019Standard6 findings
- Apr 26, 2018Standard4 findings
- Apr 27, 2017Standard8 findings
- May 26, 2016Standard6 findings
- Apr 3, 2015Standard11 findings
- Apr 17, 2014Standard and complaint13 findings
- Mar 21, 2013Standard8 findings
- Jun 14, 2012—2 findings
- May 13, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Helen Bernardy Center D/P SNFSan Diegono harm findings
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hosp & Trauma SNFSan Franciscono harm findings
- O'Connor Hospital D/P SNFSan Joseno harm findings
- John C. Fremont Healthcare District Dp/SnfMariposano harm findings
- Southern Inyo Hospital D/P SNFLone Pineno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction