Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LP
Eureka, California · CCN 055208
43 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 200
- Surveys
- 43
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES
- County
- Humboldt · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jul 24, 2026
108 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.23 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.27 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2954.7% | E2241.5% | F11.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5534×
Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5572×
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LP, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF550Apr 17, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor Resident 1's rights when a Licensed Nurse cut Resident 1's hair without permission. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents' rights and respect residents' different cultures. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included left-sided weakness as a result of a stoke, lupus (an autoimmune disease which can affect tissue and organs), and depression. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697May 9, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 residents sampled for pain (Resident 94, Resident 146, and Resident 24) received adequate pain management consistent with nursing standards of practice, the resident's individualized care plan, the resident's preference, and facility policy. Licensed nurses did not notify Resident 94's physician (Physician P) for approximately seven days when her pain was routinely high (#7-9 out of 10 on the pain scale; Pain Scale: a tool health care professionals utilize to help assess a person's pain; the pain scale is from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the worst pain imaginable), despite pain medication administration; Nursing staff did not notify Resident 146 or Resident 24's physicians of ineffective pain… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Nov 19, 2025
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week for a census of 39.This failure had the potential for residents to have unmet care needs and services.Findings:A review of the facility's third quarter (4/1/25-6/30/25) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, printed on 9/15/25, indicated the facility did not have RN coverage on 4/5/25, 5/16/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25 and 6/20/25.A review of the facility's Daily Staffing Sheet dated 4/5/25, 5/16/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25 and 6/20/25, indicated no RNs were scheduled.During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 9/24/25 at 1:57 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF553Nov 19, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure person centered, comprehensive care for seven residents (Resident 7, Resident 6, Resident 3, Resident 39, Resident 24, Resident 34, and Resident 10) out of a census of 36 when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-a group of healthcare professionals collaborating to develop and implement a resident centered treatment plan) did not plan quarterly care conferences or involve residents and/or Responsible Party (RP, a person or entity responsible for making healthcare decisions).These failures resulted in lost opportunities for the residents to be included in decisions regarding their care, treatment and interventions.Findings: A review of Resident 7's Multidisciplinary Care Conference (MCC), dated 9/10/24, indicated a quarterly… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Nov 19, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate reconciliation, accountability and disposition (the process of returning and/or destroying unused medications) of controlled medications (medications with high potential for abuse or addiction) and medication administration for a census of 39 residents when:Random controlled medication audits for two residents (Resident 20, and Resident 36) did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of Individual Narcotic Record (INR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents; and,The Controlled Substance Disposition Log was not provided for medications that were… […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 200 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 24, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 3, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Nov 19, 2025Standard6 findings
- Jun 19, 2025Complaint2 findings
- May 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Jan 12, 2024Standard and complaint13 findings
Show the 35 earlier surveys
- Oct 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 17, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 4, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2022Standard and complaint23 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 18, 2020Standard12 findings
- Oct 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2019Standard14 findings
- Oct 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 6, 2018Standard11 findings
- Aug 22, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 17, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jul 17, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 27, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 18, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 9, 2016Standard11 findings
- Nov 8, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 9, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Dec 11, 2015Standard14 findings
- Nov 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2015Standard15 findings
- Jan 17, 2014—4 findings
- Aug 23, 2013—2 findings
- May 6, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 21, 2013Complaint1 finding
- Dec 14, 2012—21 findings
- Aug 20, 2012—1 finding
- May 17, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 21, 2011—3 findings
- Oct 29, 2010—17 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction