Sea Cliff Healthcare Center
Huntington Beach, California · CCN 555249
100 surveys since 2010, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 409
- Surveys
- 100
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 182
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Orange
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jan 14, 2026
299 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.98 | 4.08 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.26 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 44.6% | 37.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D6979.3% | E1011.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B89.2% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6848×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5544×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F6564×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6574×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F7554×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sea Cliff Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF605Jan 14, 2026
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of five final sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's nonpharmacological interventions for quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) and risperidone medications were separately monitored. * Resident 2 was receiving Risperdal (risperidone, antipsychotic medication) 1.5 mg, when the order was for Risperdal 1 mg. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident 2's nonpharmacological interventions for Risperdal, citalopram (antidepressant medication), and Remeron (antidepressant medication) medications were separately monitored. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Jan 14, 2026
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided for five of five final sampled residents (Residents 24, 95, 99, 132, and 161) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 113) reviewed for respiratory care * The facility failed to ensure Resident 24 was provided with continuous oxygen at 2 LPM via nasal cannula as per the physician's order. In addition, the facility failed to ensure only the licensed nurse administered oxygen to Resident 24. Moreover, the facility failed to ensure Resident 24's nebulizer mask was not stored in a set bag when not in use. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 95's nebulizer mask was dated and stored in a set-up bag when not in use. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF757Jan 14, 2026
Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of five final sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 6) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from the unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 1's SBP prior to administering the midodrine (medication to treat low blood pressure) medication as ordered by the physician. In addition, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to hold the midodrine medication when Resident 1's SBP was greater than 120 mmHg. * The facility failed to follow the physician's order to hold the midodrine medication when Resident 2's SBP was greater than 130 mmHg. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Jan 14, 2026
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure proper medication storage for two of three medication rooms inspected (Medication Room A and Central Supply Room) and two of five medication carts inspected (Medication Carts A and B). * The facility failed to ensure the expired medication was removed from Medication Cart A. * The facility failed to ensure the medications were stored in a proper room temperature in Medication Room A. * The facility failed to ensure the expired supplies were removed from Medication Cart B. * The facility failed to ensure the externally used medications were stored separately from the orally used medications in the central supply room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 14, 2026
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure food preparation utensils and equipment were in good, sanitary, and cleanable working conditions. * The facility failed to ensure food items were discarded by the best by or use by date. * The facility failed to ensure fruits with tough rinds or peels like cantaloupes were washed with a brush. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses to the medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 409 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 26, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 14, 2026Standard and complaint20 findings
- Oct 22, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Jul 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 14, 2025Standard and complaint17 findings
- Sep 6, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Jun 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 92 earlier surveys
- Jan 9, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Sep 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 1, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Aug 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 3, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jul 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 12, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Jun 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 14, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Dec 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 10, 2022Complaint4 findings
- Nov 9, 2022Standard26 findings
- Oct 21, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Oct 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Sep 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Mar 9, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 1, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Nov 10, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 26, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Oct 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 22, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Aug 24, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jun 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 4, 2021Complaint2 findings
- May 6, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Mar 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 25, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Sep 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 13, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jul 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Apr 23, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Mar 27, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Nov 25, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 18, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Jun 18, 2019Standard20 findings
- Jun 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 7, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jun 7, 2018Complaint5 findings
- Jun 4, 2018Standard21 findings
- Apr 12, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Jan 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 29, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Oct 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 9, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jul 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 4, 2017Standard18 findings
- Jan 4, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Nov 29, 2016Complaint2 findings
- May 4, 2016Standard15 findings
- Feb 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Mar 26, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Mar 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 11, 2015Standard23 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 5, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Dec 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Dec 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2014Complaint5 findings
- Apr 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 11, 2014—20 findings
- Oct 4, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 7, 2013—2 findings
- Jan 15, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 21, 2012Standard42 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 10, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 4, 2012—2 findings
- Jul 30, 2012—2 findings
- May 24, 2012—3 findings
- Dec 5, 2011—23 findings
- Oct 14, 2010—20 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction