Scranton Health Care Center
Scranton, Pennsylvania · CCN 396095
30 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 151
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 44
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Lackawanna
- Medicare-certified since
- 2005
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Pennsylvania.
Last survey on record
Jun 18, 2026
144 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.63 | 3.69 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.81 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.2% | 52.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $12,570 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1860.0% | E930.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B26.7% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5532×
Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6972×
Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Scranton Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 21, 2023
Based on observation, review of clinical records, select facility policy, and incident reports, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to implement adequate safety measures, including sufficient staff supervision, of a resident identified as at high risk for falls, to prevent a fall with serious head injury to one resident (Resident 87) out of 12 sampled Findings include: Review of the facility Fall Prevention and Management Policy last revised February 3, 2023, indicated that residents will be assess for fall risk(s) on admission, quarterly, after any fall, and as needed. If risks are identified, preventive measures will be put in place and care planned. All falls will be reviewed and investigated. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Apr 15, 2021
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for the storage of resident care equipment, belongings and facility storage. Findings include: During an environmental tour of the facility on April 13, 2021 at approximately 1 PM, the room labeled Resident Storage located in the SP hallway, revealed that both clean resident care supplies ,used (soiled) resident equipment and the facility supply of PPE (personal protective equipment, disposable gowns and surgical masks and N-95 masks were stored in this room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 18, 2026
Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean, and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF602Nov 1, 2024
Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy and procedures and facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement measures to deter misappropriation of resident property by failing to thoroughly investigate potential misappropriation of resident property for two of 14 residents sampled (Resident 9 and 90). Findings include: A review of a facility policy for Abuse, neglect and exploitation reviewed July 2024 revealed, It is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations, suspicions and incidents of abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, intimidation, exploitation of residents, misappropriation of resident property and injuries of unknown injury. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF690Nov 1, 2024
Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement individualized measures for the toileting needs of three residents out of 14 sampled residents for bowel and bladder management (Residents 19, 34, and 20). Findings included: A review of a facility policy entitled Continence Management Program that was last reviewed by the facility on October 28, 2024, indicated the facility would develop a plan designed to manage incontinence according to the resident's needs and capabilities. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 151 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Standard4 findings
- Aug 21, 2025Standard3 findings
- Nov 1, 2024Standard11 findings
- Dec 21, 2023Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 20, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Mar 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 5, 2023Standard3 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Feb 10, 2022Standard8 findings
- Apr 15, 2021Standard5 findings
- Dec 19, 2019Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 24, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 7, 2018Standard14 findings
- Sep 27, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Oct 26, 2017Standard9 findings
- Nov 10, 2016Standard9 findings
- Oct 21, 2016Complaint8 findings
- Sep 13, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Oct 15, 2015Standard and complaint11 findings
- Jan 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Nov 14, 2014Standard5 findings
- Oct 17, 2013—6 findings
- Aug 1, 2013—3 findings
- May 14, 2013—4 findings
- Mar 26, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 15, 2013Complaint4 findings
- Nov 15, 2012—6 findings
- Oct 7, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Richfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterRichfield1 harm finding
- Havencrest Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterMonongahelano harm findings
- Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at North StrabaneCanonsburgno harm findings
- Green Valley Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CePottsville1 harm finding
- Mid-Valley Health Care CenterPeckville3 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction