Schowalter Villa
Hesston, Kansas · CCN 175386
11 surveys since 2013, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 30
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 105
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Harvey
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 7, 2024
732 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.12 | 5.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.87 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 30.9% | 38.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D466.7% | E233.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Schowalter Villa, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 8, 2021
The facility reported a census of 97 residents with 19 of those residents identified at risk for elopement (an incident in which a cognitively impaired resident with poor or impaired decision-making ability/safety awareness leaves the facility without the knowledge of staff). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision of Resident (R)1 when staff left the resident in the unlocked, outside courtyard area unsupervised. Furthermore, facility staff failed to perform 30 minute checks of the resident's whereabouts as care planned. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF679Nov 7, 2024
The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide activities on the weekends that reflected the residents' interests and preferences. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being, boredom, and isolation. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendar for September, October, and November 2024 revealed no activities were scheduled on any Saturdays for all months reviewed. The calendars indicated the residents had church services on Sunday mornings and a reading activity on Sunday afternoons. On 11/06/24 at 10:04 AM, observation revealed a daycare visit activity held with the residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF758Nov 7, 2024
The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) approved indication of use or a documented physician rationale and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat a mental disorder characterized by gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R)31, R48, R12 and R59. The facility additionally failed to ensure a physician documented rationale for the extended duration of R59's as-needed psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medication. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Nov 7, 2024
The facility reported a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to revise Resident (R)82's Care Plan to include her identified behaviors toward male residents. This deficient practice placed R82 at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - R82's Medical Diagnosis section within the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), a need for assistance with personal cares, and unsteadiness on her feet. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF756Nov 7, 2024
The facility identified a census of 95 residents. The sample included 19 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported an antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication used without a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) approved indication for use for Resident (R)31, R48, and R59. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 30 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 7, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Apr 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 13, 2019Standard4 findings
- May 14, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 23, 2018Standard8 findings
- Aug 18, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2017Standard3 findings
- Sep 14, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Jul 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jul 14, 2014Standard1 finding
- Mar 27, 2013—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction