Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center
Sarasota, Florida · CCN 106102
15 surveys since 2014. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 73
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS
- County
- Sarasota
- Medicare-certified since
- 2013
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Oct 24, 2024
746 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.47 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.78 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 41.0% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G110.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D660.0% | E220.0% | F110.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 20, 2023
Based on record review, review of facility's incidents, and policy and procedure, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (mental health condition causing dramatic shifts in mood), and alcohol abuse. On 3/10/23 Resident #1 was agitated and shoving his walker at Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) Staff C. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF791Sep 1, 2022
Based on record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures, observation, staff, and resident interview the facility failed to promptly obtain needed dental services for 1 (Resident #18) of 1 resident reviewed with repeated requests to see a dentist for dental pain. The findings included: The facility policy Dental Services SHC .08 revised 8/29/2017 read, The facility provides each resident with access to dental services. Residents will be referred to a dentist based on assessed need. The facility will obtain services of a qualified dental provider.Basic services will be provided in-house. Facility staff will assess dental status through the interdisciplinary resident assessment process and daily provision of care. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 24, 2024
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Dietary Staff B) of 1 dietary staff observed operating the dishwasher was trained, and competent to test the sanitizing solution of the low temp dishwasher to ensure dishes were properly sanitized to prevent foodborne illnesses of residents consuming an oral diet. The findings included: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Testing Sanitizer & Temperature in Low Temp Dish Machines revised 8/2023 noted, Test sanitizing solution and temperature before cleaning each meal's dishes . Test the sanitizer with chlorine test strips obtained by the chemical vendor or food distributor. A proper level is 50 ppm (part per million) chlorine in the rinse water. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Jun 4, 2024
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public in 3 (Halls 100, 300 and 400) of 4 halls observed. The findings included: During a tour of the facility on 6/4/24 multiple environmental issues were observed, including: Common hallways with tiles cracked, missing or stained throughout the building. Photographic evidence obtained The hallway handrail near the activity director room was missing with an exposed nail. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF759Feb 4, 2021
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate remained below 5%. Three errors occurred while observing five licensed nurses on two different shifts with 27 medication administration opportunities. Three medication errors were identified resulting in an 11.11% error rate. The failure to administer medications as per the pharmacy labeling and manufacture guidelines placed the residents at risk for harmful errors, sub-optimal therapy, or pharmacological effects. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 73 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Oct 24, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jun 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 20, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 1, 2022Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 4, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings
- Mar 12, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2019Standard7 findings
- Feb 26, 2019Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Aug 2, 2018Standard7 findings
- Sep 21, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2017Standard and complaint10 findings
- Apr 24, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Sep 24, 2016Standard and complaint17 findings
- Aug 7, 2015Standard and complaint10 findings
- Sep 11, 2014Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction