Sanford Senior Care Sheldon
Sheldon, Iowa · CCN 16E263
20 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 95
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 70
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Obrien · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1978
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 43 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Jun 1, 2026
161 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.43 | 4.05 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 58.9% | 41.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $11,872 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J29.5% | K29.5% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1466.7% | E314.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Sanford Senior Care Sheldon, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF684Feb 1, 2024
Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to appropriately perform assessments and interventions for the necessary care and services to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well- being for 5 out of 45 residents reviewed with signs and symptoms of COVID-19 (Residents #2, #3, #4,#5 and #6). Records showed 3 residents required hospitalization after emergency room (ER) visits, (Residents #2, #4 and #5). The failure to assess and test for COVID when signs and symptoms presented resulted in immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of [DATE] on [DATE] at 4:49 PM. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Feb 1, 2024
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to implement adequate infection control strategies and practices to mitigate the transfer of viruses by failure to test and isolate residents with respiratory signs and symptoms for 5 out of 45 residents reviewed (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6). Records showed three residents required hospitalization after emergency room (ER) visits, ( Residents #2, #4 and #5). The failure to test for COVID and isolate when signs and symptoms presented resulted in immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of [DATE] on [DATE] at 5:09 PM. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Mar 13, 2025
Based on observations, record review, staff and family interviews, the facility failed to complete accurate assessments and implement interventions for a resident to prevent the development of a Stage 4 pressure sore for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staff identified a reddened area on a resident's coccyx in [DATE] and reported it to nursing staff. The record lacked assessments of the area, notification to the physician and treatment orders. On [DATE] an open area on the coccyx was identified and measured 1cm x1 cm. The facility failed to assess the area, implement interventions, implement treatments and notify the physician and family. On [DATE] the open area to the coccyx measured 1cm x 0.8 cm. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 29, 2023
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for elopement were unable to exit the facility unattended for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #18). The facility failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the residents. The facility reported a total census of 49 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of [DATE] on [DATE] at 9:30 a.m The Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] through the following actions: A staff member is to monitor the door at all times until the Wanderguard servicing agent arrives to assess the system. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF805Nov 6, 2025
Based on observations, clinical record reviews, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a form designed to meet individual needs and according to their assessments and care plans for 5 of 9 residents (Resident #4, #9, #30, #117 and #217) reviewed. The facility failed to prepare and serve 5 meals according to the residents' prescribed diet orders. The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings include: 1. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document revealed the resident received a mechanically altered diet during the last 7 days of the assessment period. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 95 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 1, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Nov 6, 2025Standard6 findings
- Mar 13, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 3, 2024Standard6 findings
- Feb 1, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 29, 2023Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 17, 2022Standard and complaint17 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Aug 3, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 15, 2020Standard6 findings
- Nov 29, 2018Standard6 findings
- Aug 3, 2017Standard2 findings
- Mar 24, 2017Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 23, 2016Standard and complaint4 findings
- Sep 1, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 14, 2015Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 6, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jan 16, 2013—5 findings
- Jan 13, 2012—6 findings
- Jan 7, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction