Deficiency Index

San Remo

Richardson, Texas · CCN 676256

29 surveys since 2010, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
83
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
112
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CANTEX CONTINUING CARE
County
Dallas
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 16, 2026

116 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.623.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.66—
Annual nurse turnover46.8%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2365.7%E1234.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 83 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at San Remo, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 8, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items were dated, labeled and properly sealed . 2. The facility failed to ensure foods in the walk-in freezer were properly sealed. 3. The facility failed to ensure dented can goods were not stored with can good which were not dented. This failure could place residents at risk of food borne illness. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 07/06/21 at 10:00 AM revealed the walk-in refrigerator had an onion which was used and wrapped in plastic wrap with no label or date. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 30, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety.The facility failed to ensure that expired items in the refrigerator were removed.This deficient practices could affect residents who received meals and/or snacks from the main kitchen and place them at risk for food-borne illnesses.Findings Included:n Observation of the kitchen during the brief initial tour of the kitchen on 04/30/26 at 1:16 PM, revealed the following:Refrigerator area:* 1, 2 percent, half pint reduced fat milk with a best use by date of 04/25/26* 3, fat-free skim milk with a best use by date of 04/25/26 In an interview with [NAME] A on… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Feb 19, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records and treatment for nine (Residents #1, #12, #23, #42, #45, #73, #81, #119, and #130) of eighteen residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality.1. The facility failed to ensure LVN I secured Residents #1, #12, #23, #42, #45, #81, #119, and #130's medical information before leaving her nurse's cart on 02/18/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN I closed Resident #45's door while checking his blood sugar and administering his insulin on 02/18/2026.3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Feb 19, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 10 of 20 resident rooms (Rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10) observed for cleanliness. The facility failed to ensure Rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, and #10 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. This facility failure could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment, leading to a decreased quality of life.Findings included: During an observation on 02/17/26 at 11:10 a.m., revealed room [ROOM NUMBER]'s the air conditioning unit had black dirt and dust between the vents and the air filter… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF605Feb 19, 2026

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and that not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #73) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #73 was not sedated with a medication prescribed for a condition or diagnosis not listed in the resident's EHR. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of unnecessary restriction of their freedom of movement (any change in place or position for the body or any part of the body that the person is physically able to control). […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 83 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2026Standard and complaint19 findings
  • Dec 5, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Mar 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 12, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 19, 2023Complaint3 findings
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Sep 8, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2019Standard3 findings
  • May 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2018Standard9 findings · 3 harm
  • Jun 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 30, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 12, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2016Standard2 findings
  • May 20, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Jul 27, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 9, 2011—3 findings
  • Dec 10, 2010—3 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction