San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center
San Pablo, California · CCN 056359
42 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 171
- Surveys
- 42
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 108
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SOL HEALTHCARE
- County
- Contra Costa
- Medicare-certified since
- 1972
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Mar 30, 2026
224 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.16 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.71 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $10,036 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2865.1% | E1023.3% | F12.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B24.7% | C12.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5503×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6003×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F9123×
Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at San Pablo Healthcare & Wellness Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 26, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice supply was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions when there was reddish-brown matter inside the residents' ice machine and around the ice chute dispenser. These failures had potential to put residents at risk for food borne illness (an illness that comes from eating contaminated food and infection) and cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria or other microorganisms from one substance to another) that could have resulted in infection or spread of infection. Findings: During an observation and interview on 6/24/25 at 2:10 p.m. with the Maintenance Director (MD) and Registered Dietician (RD). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF606Feb 2, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy and procedure to not employ or continue to employ anyone found guilty of abuse when: Facility employed one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) who had a finding of patient abuse record on background screening report conducted prior to employment. Facility did not check information from previous and/or current employers and make reasonable efforts to uncover information about any past criminal prosecutions for CNA 1 prior to employment. Finding is defined as a determination made by the state that validates allegation, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of their property. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for emotional distress, mistreatment, or abuse. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Jun 26, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standards of professional practice were maintained during medication administration for four of four sampled residents (Residents 52, 253, 56 and 93) when licensed nurse pre-poured (generally refers to medications that have been prepared in advance and are ready for administration, rather than being prepared immediately before use) Residents 52, 253, 56 and 93's medication. This failure had the potential for a significant medication error that can lead to serious harm or even death. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Jun 26, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food for four of 12 sampled residents (Residents 22, 56, 38 and 254) that was palatable when food was bland (lacked flavor). This failure had the potential to result in a negative dining experience that could lead to poor dietary intake, compromising the health and nutritional status of Residents 22, 56, 38 and 254 who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation and interview on 6/23/25, at 10:41 a.m. with Resident 22, Resident 22 stated the facility's food always tasted bland and lacked flavor. Resident 22 stated, Look at those salt and pepper I have on my table. That's how terrible their food is. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 3, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 (a respiratory virus that can cause mild to severe respiratory illness) when: 1. Resident room doors in the COVID-19 positive wing were left open. 2. The portable air conditioning unit filters were not cleaned per manufacturer's recommendation. 3. The portable air conditioning unit in the COVID-19 positive wing was turned off. Findings: During an interview on 7/2/24 at 1:57 p.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated there were 36 active cases of COVID-19 as of 7/2/24. During an interview and concurrent record review on 7/2/24 at 2:04 p.m. with IP, facility map and list of COVID-19 residents were reviewed. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 171 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Feb 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 26, 2025Standard7 findings
- Jun 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 1, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jan 2, 2025Complaint3 findings
Show the 34 earlier surveys
- Oct 9, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Oct 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 24, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Feb 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 2, 2024Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 4, 2021Standard9 findings
- Sep 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2019Standard4 findings
- Feb 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2018Standard4 findings
- Sep 27, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 13, 2017Standard5 findings
- Mar 9, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 14, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Aug 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 29, 2016Standard9 findings
- Nov 20, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 8, 2015Standard8 findings
- Jul 13, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Apr 30, 2015Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 2, 2014Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- May 7, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2013Standard30 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 10, 2012—2 findings
- May 4, 2012—12 findings
- Feb 23, 2011—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction