Deficiency Index

San Bruno Skilled Nursing

San Bruno, California · CCN 555276

19 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
97
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
45
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
San Mateo
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 10, 2026

122 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.424.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover37.0%36.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3286.5%E410.8%F12.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 37 of the 97 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6272×

    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

  • F6372×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7592×

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at San Bruno Skilled Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF920Jun 14, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient space to accommodate group activities and communal dining for 43 residents. This failure resulted in limiting residents to participate in group activities and communal dining; caused inconvenience to residents whose rooms were in the hallway where the activities are conducted; and placed residents at risk for feelings of being isolated or depressed. Findings: The facility is licensed for 45 beds and the resident census on 6/11/24 was 43. During an observation on 6/11/24 at 9:29 AM, in the hallway between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 5, four residents were sitting on their wheelchair with one staff in front of them playing music on an iPad (a brand of a tablet computer). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF627Jul 10, 2026

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow transfer and discharge requirements related to transfer and discharge for 7 out of 14 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7). This failure resulted in or had the potential to result in residents experiencing inappropriate or unsafe transfer or discharge decisions, and increased risk of unmet care needs or disruption in continuity of care.During an interview on 07/02/2026 at 10:12 AM with Family Member 1 (FM 1) of Resident 6), FM 1 stated the Social Worker (SW) informed FM 1 that Resident 6 would have to move out because the facility is no longer a long term care facility and is converting to short term care only.During an interview on 07/03/2026 at 10:55 AM with FM 2 of Resident 6, FM 2 stated the social worker… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Dec 5, 2025

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a private space to participate in resident council meetings (regular gatherings where residents meet to discuss concerns or suggest improvements for their living environment).This failure resulted in residents not receiving adequate privacy during their group meetings.Findings:During a group interview on 12/03/2025 at 3:00 PM with Residents (58, 24, 26, 27, 43), Resident 24 stated, Resident Council meetings are often held in a hallway due to limited private spaces within the facility. Resident 24 stated, The only space is the old dining room, but that is being used for the gym now. When asked if a private space to participate in resident council meetings was requested by the participating residents. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF605Dec 5, 2025

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring for antipsychotic medications (a class of psychiatric drugs that helps manage severe mental health symptoms) for two out of five sampled residents (Residents 2 and 5) and PRN (as needed) medications were ordered beyond 14 days for three out of five sampled residents (Residents 7,8,18).This failure had the potential to result in adverse consequences ranging from functional decline, hospitalization, permanent injury, or death. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/04/2025 at 5:37 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN1), Resident 2's blood pressure values on 11/07/2025 was reviewed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF756Dec 5, 2025

    Based upon interview and record review the facility did not provide adequate medication review for five out of five sampled residents (Residents 2,5,7,8,18) when: 1) One out of five sampled residents (Resident 18)'s as needed antipsychotic orders, did not include end dates or rationales were not addressed in the medical record. 2) One out of five sampled residents (Resident 18)'s medication profile was not reviewed monthly after admission. 3) Four out of five sampled residents (Resident 2,5,7,8 )'s recommendations made by the pharmacist were not followed up, implemented, or addressed. 4) One out of five sampled residents (Resident 5)'s is on multiple antipsychotic medications for same diagnosis of MDD. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 97 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 10, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Nov 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2024Standard17 findings
  • Feb 10, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Apr 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Feb 13, 2020Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 12, 2019Standard11 findings
  • Mar 22, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Mar 17, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Apr 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Dec 5, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Dec 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2013—2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2012—4 findings
  • Oct 22, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction