Deficiency Index

Salinas Valley Post Acute

Salinas, California · CCN 055739

64 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
173
Surveys
64
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file54/64

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
Monterey
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Feb 13, 2026

269 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.064.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.62—
Annual nurse turnover45.5%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3570.0%E1428.0%F12.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 50 of the 173 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6414×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F7553×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Salinas Valley Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 13, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention practices when:1. Staff did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE, clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments, e.g., gloves, mask, gown) when caring for a resident on enhanced-barrier precautions (an infection control practice used to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms); 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) M used the same paper tissue to wipe excess liquid from both eyes during the administration of eye medications for Resident 74; 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Feb 13, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assessments and services which meet professional standards of quality for 11 of 21 sampled residents (Residents 92, 52, 83, 1, 72, 73, 7, 8, 91, 47, and 9) when the following were observed: 1.Inaccurate bed rail (metal or rigid plastic and adjustable safety bars attached to the sides of the bed) and entrapment risk observation/assessments for Resident 72, 52, 1, and 83; 2.Inaccurate bed rail and entrapment risk observation/assessments for Resident 73, 7, 8, 91, 47, and 9; 3.Treatment nurse C (TN C) applied zinc oxide (topical skin barrier) to wound without a physician's order for Resident 92.These failures had the potential to compromise the health and safety of above sampled residents. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 13, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff covered facial hair while working over exposed food in the kitchen. This deficient practice placed 95 residents at risk for receiving contaminated food in the facility. Findings: During an observation of the meal tray line on 2/11/26 at approximately 11:35 a.m., the dietary aide N (DA N) and dietary cook M (DC M ) were observed with visible facial hair and were not wearing beard restraints while working over exposed food in kitchen. Dietary staff were plating and checking meal trays while standing over exposed food items during tray line service. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 2:30 p.m., DA N stated that during tray line he was only checking the food and not handling it. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Sep 20, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for an advance directive (AD: a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney [a document that authorizes to act on behalf of resident] for healthcare when the individual is incapacitated) and completion of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST: a document that specifies the medical treatments the resident wants to receive during serious illness) form for 9 of 9 sampled residents (Residents 39, 37, 92, 43, 11, 85, 58, 91, and 78). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Sep 20, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of side rails for six (Residents 303, 304, 91, 44, 75, and 12) of 30 residents when: 1. For Residents 303 and 304, there were no signed informed consents for the use of side rails by the resident or the responsible party for either resident. 2. For Resident 91, the informed consent on file was missing a signature from the resident or responsible party. 3. For Residents 44, 75 and 12, there were no care plans for the use of side rails for any of the three residents These failures had the potential to compromise the resident's rights to fully make informed decisions on the use of side rails, and had the potential to put residents at risk for entrapment or serious injury. Findings: 1. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 173 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 26, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2026Standard12 findings
  • Jul 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2024Standard15 findings
  • Aug 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 56 earlier surveys
  • Jun 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2023Standard and complaint15 findings
  • May 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 14, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 30, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 12, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 17, 2019Standard16 findings
  • Sep 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 18, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 21, 2018Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 27, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Nov 3, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2016Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 1, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Jun 15, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 29, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 24, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2014Standard10 findings
  • May 13, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 21, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2013—11 findings
  • Aug 26, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction