Deficiency Index

Saints Joachim & Anne Nursing and Rehabilitation C

Brooklyn, New York · CCN 335748

10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
33
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
200
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Kings
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 22, 2025

566 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.263.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.89—
Annual nurse turnover40.9%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD880.0%E—F110.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B110.0%C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 33 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Saints Joachim & Anne Nursing and Rehabilitation C, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Apr 24, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 04/17/2023 to 04/24/2023, the facility did not ensure that menus were followed. This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Food out of 39 sampled residents (Resident #91 and Resident #288) and 182 residents present on 4/17/23. Specifically, 1) Resident # 91 received food items that did not match items on the tray ticket, and 2) Resident #288 reported they were served pork, fried foods and not their preferred foods. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF553Apr 22, 2025

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 04/15/2025 to 04/22/2025, the facility did not ensure that resident or resident's representative were offered the opportunity to participate in the revision and/or review of the comprehensive care plan. Specifically, resident and/or resident's representatives were not consistently invited to participate in their care plan meetings. This was evident for 1 (Resident #116) of 2 residents reviewed for Care Plan out of 37 sampled residents. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Apr 22, 2025

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 04/15/2025 to 04/22/2025, the facility did not ensure residents, or their designated representatives were provided appropriate notification at the termination of Medicare Part A benefits. This was evident for 2 (Resident #67 and Resident #482) of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1). the facility did not ensure that assistive devices were used to make appropriate notification, and 2). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Apr 24, 2023

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained. This was evident for 4 of 5 resident floors (Floors 3, 5, 6, and 7). Specifically, resident rooms were observed with broken window blinds (Floors 3 and 5), torn window screens (6th Floor), and missing blinds and privacy curtains (7th floor). Resident wheelchairs had stained cushions (3rd and 6th Floor) and wheel noted with worn tires on both sides with decreased tread chipped paint on oxygen canister holder with a missing screw, wheelchair tires were noted to have multiple decreased rubber tread on bilateral wheels (6th floor). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Apr 24, 2023

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00313269) from [DATE] and [DATE], the facility did not ensure that residents' comprehensive care plans (CCPs) were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment and as needed. This was evident for 3 out of 39 sampled residents (Residents #19, #16 and #134). Specifically, (1) Resident #19's Advance Directive CCP was not reviewed and revised when their code status was changed to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and after the quarterly assessment; (2) Resident #16's CCP related to Anemia and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was not reviewed and revised to reflect a change in the resident's status after hospitalization ; and (3) Resident #134's elopement risk CCP was not reviewed… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 33 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 22, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Apr 24, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Sep 15, 2020Standard1 finding
  • May 2, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 14, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jan 18, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2013—13 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Aug 31, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction