Deficiency Index

Sage View Care Center

Rock Springs, Wyoming · CCN 535056

16 surveys since 2015, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
69
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2015–2026
’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
82
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Sweetwater · rural
Medicare-certified since
2015
Ownership changed
In the last 12 months

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 15, 2026

298 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.363.28
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.77—
Annual nurse turnover48.3%49.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,278 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG18.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD758.3%E325.0%F18.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 69 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6231×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6891×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Sage View Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF805Jan 15, 2026

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility incident review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form to meet resident needs for 1 of 9 sample residents (#1) reviewed. This failure resulted in actual harm to resident #1. Corrective measures were implemented prior to the survey and compliance was determined to be met on 1/9/26. The findings were:1. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed resident #1 had no long-term or short-term memory impairment and diagnoses which included cerebral palsy and esophageal obstruction. Further review showed the resident required a mechanically altered and therapeutic diet. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Feb 13, 2025

    Based on staff schedule review, daily staff posting review, time punch history review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days per week. The census was 533. The findings were: 1. Review of the February 2025 nursing schedule failed to show an RN had been scheduled for 2/8/25. 2. Review of the daily staff postings failed to show there was an RN on duty for 2/8/25. 3. Review of the time punch history for RN #1 showed on 2/8/25 she worked for 3.25 hours from 11:53 AM to 3:12 PM. 4. Interview with the DON on 2/12/25 at 1:49 PM revealed the RN on duty had been on-call and only worked 3.5 hours on 2/8/25. She stated she understood the nurse needed to be on duty for 8 hours; however, she confirmed the RN did not work 8 hours.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Feb 21, 2024

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure appropriate disinfection of reusable equipment was performed before contact with 4 of 4 sample residents (#1, #3, #7, #11). In addition, the facility failed to implement appropriate hand hygiene practices during 1 of 4 meal observations. The census was 39. The findings were: 1. Review of the medical record for resident #11 showed s/he most recent admission was on 1/30/24 and had diagnoses which included pneumonia. The following concerns were identified: a. Observation on 2/20/24 at 3 PM showed resident #1 and resident #11 were in their room and resident #1 was coughing. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF732Oct 20, 2022

    Based on review of daily staffing records, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately post daily nurse staffing data. The census was 40. The findings were: 1. Review of the Daily Staffing for Nursing sheets for 10/6/22 through 10/18/22 failed to show the actual hours worked by the registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and the certified nurse aides responsible for resident care per shift. 2. Interview with the administrator on 10/19/22 at 12:05 PM confirmed the daily staff posting failed to include the actual hours worked by the resident care staff.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Oct 20, 2022

    Based on observation, review of the menu, staff and resident interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to follow the controlled carbohydrate (CCHO) diet menu for 9 of 9 residents (#1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #10, #12, #13, #16) observed who required that diet. The findings were: 1. Review of medical records showed the following diet orders: a. Resident #1 had an order for a CCHO diet dated 9/15/22. b. Resident #4 had an order for a CCHO diet dated 10/16/19. c. Resident #5 had an order for a CCHO diet dated 7/26/22. d. Resident #6 had an order for CCHO diet dated 9/2/22. e. Resident #7 had an order for a CCHO diet dated 8/18/22. f. Resident #10 had an order for a CCHO diet dated 7/21/17. g. Resident #12 had an order for a CCHO diet dated 10/11/22. h. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 69 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 15, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 13, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jul 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Oct 20, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Sep 23, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jun 10, 2021Infection control1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Sep 26, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Apr 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2018Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Aug 30, 2017Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Apr 28, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 15, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 14, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Jul 30, 2015Standard and complaint14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction