Deficiency Index

Rushville Nursing & Rehab CTR

Rushville, Illinois · CCN 145488

31 surveys since 2011, 13 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
113
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
13
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ATIED ASSOCIATES
County
Schuyler · rural
Medicare-certified since
1984

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 140 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Illinois.

Last survey on record

Jun 30, 2026

132 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.113.18
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.89—
Annual nurse turnover46.8%45.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ26.1%K—L—
Actual harmG26.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2266.7%E26.1%F515.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 113 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7583×

    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

  • F6052×

    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rushville Nursing & Rehab CTR, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jun 1, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff respected R1's right to refuse care, failed to prevent staff from using physical force during care, and failed to protect R1 from abuse when staff held R1's arms and hands down and provided care against R1's expressed refusal while R1 repeatedly yelled No, Get off me, and Let go of me. These failures resulted in R1 being manually restrained during care, caused R1 fear, distress, and psychosocial harm, and created Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety.These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/28/25 when staff forced care on R1 despite R1's refusal and signs of distress. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF690Jun 1, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment, monitoring, physician notification, diagnostic evaluation, and intervention for significant changes in condition related to urinary catheter complications and signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters in the sample of three. The facility failed to recognize, investigate, escalate, and respond to repeated abnormal urinary findings and changes in condition despite R1's known history of recurrent UTIs, urosepsis, and rapid clinical decline requiring prior hospitalizations. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 4, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to utilize a gait belt during ambulation, for one resident (R2) of three residents, in a total sample of three residents reviewed for supervision. This failure resulted in R2 being hospitalized , with a femur fracture which required surgical intervention. Findings Include: Facility Policy, entitled Gait Belts, dated 4/13, document, Gait belts are used to help prevent injury of staff or residents during transfers and ambulation; 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686May 25, 2023

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement pressure relieving interventions and perform daily Diabetic foot skin assessments for one of two residents (R47) reviewed for impaired skin integrity, in a sample of 27. These failures resulted in R47 developing unstageable pressure ulcers to the right and left heel after being admitted to the facility, which lead to osteomyelitis of the left heel and a delay in his discharge back to home. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Pressure Ulcer and Wound Prevention/Management Program (updated 12/05/2006) documents, Purpose: To identify residents who are at risk for pressure ulcers and skin breakdown. To prevent pressure ulcers and skin breakdown. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 8, 2022

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified as a fall risk was wearing proper footwear and was provided adequate supervision, and failed to conduct a fall investigation according to facility policy, for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of three. These failures resulted in R1 falling in her room on 11/04/22 and sustaining a Left Femoral Neck Fracture (Hip). Findings include: The facility policy, titled Falls - Clinical Protocol (revised August 2008) documents, 1. As part of the initial assessment, the physician will help identify individuals with a history of falls and risk factors for subsequent falling. The policy indicates, 3. […]

Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 113 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 30, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Jun 1, 2026Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Dec 4, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 13, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Sep 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 25, 2023Standard6 findings · 1 harm
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Dec 8, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 21, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 18, 2021Standard8 findings
  • Feb 24, 2021Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 16, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 25, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 12, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Jan 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2017Standard7 findings
  • May 26, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Apr 20, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 25, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 10, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Mar 17, 2014Standard16 findings · 5 harm
  • Mar 18, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction