Royal Wood Mill Center
Lawrence, Massachusetts · CCN 225505
20 surveys since 2010, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 123
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 94
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ROYAL HEALTH GROUP
- County
- Essex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Mar 25, 2026
229 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.76 | 3.58 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.57 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 39.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G27.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1661.5% | E726.9% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.8% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Royal Wood Mill Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 9, 2024
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had dementia, was known to wander and put objects in his/her mouth, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision and an environment that was free from safety hazards, when on 03/29/24 nursing staff failed to secure medications delivered from the pharmacy, left them unattended at the Nurses' Station, and Resident #1 gained accessed to and was believed to have ingested multiple Seroquel (antipsychotic) and Risperidone (antipsychotic) tablets. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF761Apr 9, 2024
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was known to wander, rummage, and eat food he/she found, the Facility failed to ensure that medications were kept locked up (secured) or under direct supervision of nursing staff, when on 03/29/24, Nurse #1 left a medication package delivered from the Pharmacy unattended on the desk at the Nurses' Station, and as a result, Resident #1 was later found with the opened package and was believed to have ingested multiple Seroquel (antipsychotic) and Risperidone (antipsychotic) tablets. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF688Mar 3, 2023
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a decline in range of motion for 1 Resident (#30) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in June 2022, with diagnoses hemiplegia (paralysis) of the left side. Review of Resident #30's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she is cognitively intact. On 3/2/23 at approximately 8:30 A.M., Resident #30 was observed sitting in his/her wheelchair. Resident #30's right foot was pointing towards the ground and inward. When asked, Resident #30 was unable to move his/her ankle. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 3, 2023
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to 1) prevent 1 Resident (#9) from choking by providing the wrong diet and 2) failed to prevent 1 Resident (#26) from falling out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident # 9 was admitted to the facility in March 2018, with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and dementia. Review of Resident #9's most recent Minimum Data Set, dated dated dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she has moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicates Resident #9 requires supervision for self-feeding at meals. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Mar 3, 2023
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to identify a significant weight loss in a timely manner for 1 Resident (#23), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled; Weight Surveillance, undated, indicated the following: -Resident weights are an important indicator of nutritional status and overall health status. -Re-weights are to be obtained if there is a three-pound discrepancy from the previous weight. […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 123 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 25, 2026Standard1 finding
- Mar 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 9, 2025Standard12 findings
- Apr 22, 2024Standard9 findings
- Apr 9, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2023Standard16 findings · 4 harm
- Dec 3, 2021Standard6 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Sep 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2019Standard16 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 4, 2019Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- May 3, 2018Standard15 findings
- Mar 2, 2017Standard8 findings
- Aug 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 11, 2016Standard6 findings
- Feb 12, 2015Standard1 finding
- Jul 25, 2013—1 finding
- Oct 26, 2012—7 findings
- Nov 23, 2010—15 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction