Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab
Las Vegas, Nevada · CCN 295073
40 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 221
- Surveys
- 40
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 225
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- IL & JOAN LEE
- County
- Clark
- Medicare-certified since
- 1999
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 21 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Nevada.
Last survey on record
Mar 13, 2026
241 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.69 | 3.51 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.87 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.5% | 42.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $40,359 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3384.6% | E410.3% | F12.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6933×
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Oct 29, 2024
Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to assess, re-assess, and adequately monitor a resident with a change in condition for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice: 1) resulted in an acute physical decline that contributed to the resident's emergent transport to the hospital where the resident passed away, and 2) placed facility residents who had a change in condition at risk for poor clinical outcomes. Findings include: Resident 3 (R3) R3 admitted was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic heart failure. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 21, 2023
Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by providing timely incontinent care for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident #186). The failure to protect the resident rights from neglect places residents at risk to acquire Moisture Associated Skin Damage from being left wet in an incontinent brief for a long period of time when incontinent care was not provided timely. Findings include: Resident #186 (R186) R186 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including sepsis, polyneuropathy, and obesity. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented R186 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated R186 was moderate impaired. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 15, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to discard an expired food item and ensure 1 of 3 nourishment refrigerator temperatures were maintained. The deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for a foodborne illness. Findings include: On [DATE] at 7:44 AM, an initial kitchen tour was conducted with the Dietary Director. On [DATE] at 8:01 AM, the walk-in refrigerator had 10 cartons of thickened dairy beverage with a best before date of [DATE]. The Dietary Director acknowledged the food item and best before date. On [DATE] at 8:30 AM, the Dietary Director indicated there were three nourishment refrigerators in the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 21, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) opened food items were labeled and dated in kitchen, 2) expired food items were discarded, 3) staffs' personal food items and beverages were not in food preparation areas, 4) dishwasher chemical was properly dispensing, 5) the cleanliness of the kitchen and equipment, 6) walk-in freezer was free from ice build-up, 7) perishable butter was properly refrigerated, and 8) nourishment room food items in the refrigerator and freezer were labeled, dated, and expired items were discarded. The failure to label and date food items, maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen had the potential to serve foods to the residents at an increased risk of food safety. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Feb 21, 2023
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to review and update their facility assessment at least annually. The failure could result in the facility not being able to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently. Findings include: The Facility Assessment indicated the document had been last reviewed and approved 10/2021. The Facility Assessment indicted it was the facility practice to review and update the document annually or with significant changes in facility operations. On 02/21/2023, in the morning, the Administrator explained the facility practice was to update the Assessment annually as part of the QAPI process. The Administrator verified the Assessment documented the last review and update was over one year prior. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 221 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 13, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings
- Feb 14, 2025Standard12 findings
- Oct 29, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 15, 2024Standard14 findings
- Feb 21, 2023Standard19 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 4, 2022Complaint7 findings
- Jan 22, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Nov 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 32 earlier surveys
- Sep 3, 2020Infection control6 findings
- Jul 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
- May 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 11, 2020Standard29 findings
- Nov 15, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 23, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Sep 5, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Aug 2, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Jun 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 22, 2019Standard27 findings
- Jan 22, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Dec 13, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Nov 27, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Oct 12, 2018Complaint5 findings
- May 25, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Mar 21, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jan 12, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings
- Sep 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 30, 2016Standard7 findings
- Feb 26, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jan 16, 2015Standard6 findings
- Oct 15, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jun 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Nov 22, 2013—11 findings
- Sep 19, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 22, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 14, 2012—1 finding
- Nov 6, 2012—10 findings
- Apr 20, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 14, 2011—9 findings
- Apr 21, 2011—3 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 19, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction