Deficiency Index

Rosewood Health Facility

Bakersfield, California · CCN 555116

73 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
175
Surveys
73
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file60/73

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
79
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
HUMANGOOD
County
Kern
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 21 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Feb 12, 2026

270 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.824.82
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.02—
Annual nurse turnover24.1%28.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,278 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3063.8%E1123.4%F510.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 47 of the 175 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5572×

    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rosewood Health Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 11, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary team (IDT- a group of professionals from different fields in the nursing facility that work together to address a patient's needs) met to discuss if one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was high risk for falls (move downward, typically rapidly and freely without control from a higher to a lower level), had a history of falls, and had a diagnosis of Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), was safe to have one-on-one monitoring (1:1- a type of care where a healthcare professional provides constant supervision to a resident) discontinued. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Feb 12, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failure resulted in ineffective infection surveillance (continuous method to collect, analyze, monitor and reduce infections) and antibiotic stewardship program (a program to monitor the use of antibiotics - medications used to treat infections in healthcare settings) and had the potential to increase the spread of infectious diseases to residents, staff, and visitors.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/11/26 at 9:13 a.m. with IP, IP's training record was reviewed. IP stated she had not completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Nov 7, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Water Management Program for 71 of 71 sampled resident's when the facility cooling tower (device that removes heat from water and used to cool a building) tested positive for Legionella (bacteria causing lung infection). This failure had the potential to spread a highly contagious, infectious bacteria to residents, visitors, and staff. Findings: During an interview on 11/6/24 at 9:30 a.m. with Safety Officer (SO), SO stated the cooler connected to the water tower tested positive for Legionella and the water treatment company treated the water. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF756Feb 9, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities noted by the consultant pharmacist in the Medication Regimen Review (MRR-a comprehensive pharmacy evaluation of the residents' medications) for 11 of 29 sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 24, Resident 39, Resident 42, Resident 46, Resident 61, and Resident 165) were reviewed and acted upon by the attending physician and the Director of Nursing (DON) promptly. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for adverse consequences and other medication-related problems. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 9, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) on Preventing Foodborne Illness-Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices when one of one sampled staff member (Activities Staff- AS) did not wear hair net properly upon entering kitchen. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/7/23, at 11:14 AM, with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) 2, in the Resident dining room, AS was observed going into and coming out of the kitchen with approximately one half of the back of his head uncovered by a hair net. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 175 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 12, 2026Standard9 findings
  • Dec 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Oct 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 65 earlier surveys
  • Jan 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 18, 2023Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 9, 2023Standard14 findings
  • Feb 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Sep 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 20, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Sep 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Aug 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 10, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Oct 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Dec 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 17, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 22, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Oct 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 20, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Aug 21, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 24, 2013—4 findings
  • Oct 16, 2013—2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2013—2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2012—6 findings
  • Aug 21, 2012—2 findings
  • Dec 15, 2011—5 findings
  • Jul 13, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 17, 2011—1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction