Rosewood Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Broomall, Pennsylvania · CCN 395052
23 surveys since 2010, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 93
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 146
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PRESTIGE HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
- County
- Delaware
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 6, 2026
276 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.70 | 3.39 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.71 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 24.8% | 49.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6611×
Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
- F8421×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Rosewood Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Feb 6, 2026
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflect the residents' status for one of 27 residents reviewed. (Resident 11).Findings include:Review of Resident 11's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs) dated December 11, 2025, revealed under section N0350 - Insulin, that the resident was not marked as receiving insulin medication.Review of Resident 11's physician's orders revealed that the resident has an order for insulin.Review of Resident 11's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the resident did receive insulin on two days of the seven days look back period, December 9th and 10th 2026. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Nov 22, 2024
Based upon clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set Assessments were completed accurately for two of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 46 and 106 Resident). Findings include: Review of Resident 46's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident needs) dated September 4, 2024, revealed Resident 46 had a right foot pressure ulcer (opening of the skin caused by prolong pressure applied to an area). Review of Resident 46's clinical record revealed Resident 46 had a right foot wound as a result of an injury. Further review of Resident 46's clinical record failed to reveal evidence of a right foot pressure ulcer. Interview with the Director of Nursing on November 24, 2024 at 8:50 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF661Nov 22, 2024
Based on a review of the clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a complete discharge summary was done for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: Review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of progress notes revealed that the resident had a planned discharge on November 8, 2024. Further review of the clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the physician completed a discharge summary with a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on November 22, 2024, at 11:30 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Nov 22, 2024
Based upon clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records contained accurate documentation for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 46). Findings include: Review of Resident 46's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident needs) dated September 4, 2024, revealed Resident 46 had a right foot pressure ulcer (opening of the skin caused by prolong pressure applied to an area). Review of Resident 46's clinical record revealed Resident 46 had a right foot wound as a result of an injury that occurred on July 3, 2024. Further review of Resident 46's clinical record failed to reveal evidence of a right foot pressure ulcer. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Feb 27, 2023
Based on clinical record review and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during a transfer for one of three residents reviewed for falls (Resident 86). Findings include: Review of Resident 86's clinical record revealed diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the resident's left non-dominant side and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident 86's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated September 17, 2022, revealed the resident required extensive assistance of two staff persons for transfers during the lookback period. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 93 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 6, 2026Standard1 finding
- Nov 22, 2024Standard3 findings
- Feb 27, 2023Standard3 findings
- Feb 11, 2022Standard2 findings
- Oct 23, 2020Standard3 findings
- Jun 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 26, 2019Standard7 findings
- Mar 19, 2018Standard7 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Apr 26, 2017Standard7 findings
- Dec 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Mar 31, 2016Standard10 findings
- Jan 28, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jul 21, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 30, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jul 30, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 15, 2014Standard13 findings
- Apr 5, 2013—8 findings
- Mar 8, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 25, 2013—1 finding
- Oct 18, 2012—6 findings
- Apr 5, 2012—8 findings
- Jun 2, 2011—1 finding
- Nov 15, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction