Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Shreveport, Louisiana · CCN 195496
24 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 85
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 124
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY
- County
- Caddo
- Medicare-certified since
- 2000
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Louisiana.
Last survey on record
Jun 10, 2026
152 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.76 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 56.9% | 45.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,901 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J210.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1260.0% | E630.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Aug 13, 2025
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect during ADL (activities of daily living) care. The facility failed to ensure S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) asked for assistance for a two person assist before providing incontinence care which resulted in a fall with injuries for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents reviewed for neglect.The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on 07/25/2025 at approximately 10:30 a.m. when Resident #1 fell out of the right side of the bed during incontinent care when S4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) failed to ensure a two person assist was used during incontinent care to prevent Resident #1 from falling out of the bed. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 16, 2023
Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 (#1) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) sampled residents reviewed for risk of elopement. The deficient practice resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1 on 07/31/2023 at 8:00 p.m. when Resident #1 exited through the dining room door of the facility. On 7/31/2023 the facility was notified by a concerned community citizen that Resident #1 was found outside approximately 300 feet from facility near a railroad track 12 minutes after Resident #1 exited the facility. On 07-31-2023 at 8:21 p.m., Resident #1 returned to the facility assisted by S3 [NAME] Clerk and S4 LPN (licensed practical nurse). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Feb 24, 2026
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents and ensure the residents' environment remained free of hazards for 1 (#1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for facility transportation. The facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident #1 was properly secured with shoulder and lap belt in the facility van,2. Ensure Resident #1 was assessed following a fall on the van, and3. Ensure Resident #1's fall was promptly reported and documented.Findings:Review of Facility's Policy and Procedures, in part revealed:Accident/Incident Reports (undated): Policy: When an accident or incident involving a resident occurs, any witnessing staff will offer immediate assistance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Jan 7, 2026
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 2 (#12 and #20) of 9 residents reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. The facility failed to ensure there were no medications at the bedside.Findings:Review of the facility's undated self-administration of medication policy revealed in part:Policy:It is the policy of this facility that each resident has the right to self-administer medications, but is the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team to determine that it is safe prior to the resident exercising that right.Procedure:2. If the resident wishes to self-administer medications, the Interdisciplinary Team must assess the resident's overall ability to safely administer his/her own medications. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Jan 7, 2026
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (#7 and #9) out of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility failed to ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment. Findings:Review of the facility's undated oxygen administration (concentrator or tank) policy revealed in part:Policy:Humidifier bottles, cannulas and oxygen tubing will be changed at least once weekly and dated. Concentrator filter should be cleaned weekly or as needed as well. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 85 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 10, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Feb 24, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jan 7, 2026Standard8 findings
- Aug 13, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 6, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Oct 25, 2023Standard3 findings
- Aug 16, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 2, 2022Standard4 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Dec 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 11, 2019Standard7 findings
- Oct 18, 2018Standard4 findings
- Jul 3, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 3, 2017Standard3 findings
- Aug 30, 2017Complaint4 findings
- Dec 1, 2016Standard1 finding
- Jun 3, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Nov 6, 2015Standard11 findings
- Nov 21, 2013—8 findings
- Dec 13, 2012—6 findings
- Oct 18, 2012—2 findings
- Oct 27, 2011—4 findings
- Aug 4, 2011—3 findings
- Oct 21, 2010—1 finding
- Sep 10, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction