Deficiency Index

Rose Mountain Care Center

New Brunswick, New Jersey · CCN 315384

12 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
67
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
112
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE ROSENBERG FAMILY
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 85 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New Jersey.

Last survey on record

May 29, 2026

164 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.723.53
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.53—
Annual nurse turnover25.3%41.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2660.5%E1125.6%F614.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 43 of the 67 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5572×

    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rose Mountain Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF679Dec 12, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) carry out activities per a resident's care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #25), and b.) conduct on-going activity assessments to determine resident's interests, hobbies, and cultural preferences to acquire a meaningful life for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #3, #21, #25, #83, #84) reviewed for activities. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/3/2024 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 lying in bed. Resident #25's family member was present and stated that the resident was supposed to be getting a daily newspaper in their preferred language. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF680Dec 12, 2024

    38079 Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility activities program was directed by a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or activity professional. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility and was evidenced by the following: On 12/03/2024 at 9:58 AM, Surveyor #1 observed a family member in resident #25's room. The family member stated they were upset because Resident #25 was supposed to be getting a daily newspaper in their language, but no newspapers were being delivered. On 12/04/24 at 9:19 AM, Surveyor #2 observed a staff assisting residents at mealtime in the main dining room. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF712Dec 12, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents a.) conducted face-to-face visits and wrote progress notes at least every thirty days for the first ninety days of admission, b.) were seen by the physician or nurse practitioner every thirty days with a physician visit at least every sixty days, and c.) documented an admission History and Physical (H&P) within 72 hours of a resident's admission to the facility. This deficient practice was observed for 4 of 18 residents and 1 closed record (Resident #13, #33, #81, #83 and #85) reviewed for physician visits. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF847Dec 12, 2024

    Based on interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were explicitly informed of and understanding was assessed prior to having the residents enter into a arbitration agreement which was identified as a mandatory part of the Admission Agreement for 9 of 9 Residents who attended a resident council meeting (Resident #6, #11, #20, #21, #24, #27, #40, #71, #78) and was evidenced by the following: On 12/03/24 at 10:07 AM, during the facility entrance conference held with the Liscensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the [NAME] President of Clinical Services Registered Nurse (VPRN). The surveyor asked if the facility utilized arbitration agreements. The LNHA stated absolutely, we offer arbitration and it is in their admission agreement. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Dec 12, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure a process was in place to identify residents who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention used to reduce the transmission of resistant organisms in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), by posting clear signage outside of resident rooms indicating the type of Protective Personal Equipment (PPE) to be worn and defining the high risk resident care activities associated with EBP for 8 of 8 EBP rooms, b.) provide residents with hand hygiene (hh) and ensure staff performed hh in between serving and setting up residents with meals, c.) remove contaminated gloves prior to walking around in a non-clinical… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 67 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 29, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Dec 12, 2024Standard12 findings
  • Sep 28, 2023Standard20 findings
  • May 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2021Standard7 findings
  • Aug 15, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Sep 7, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2017Standard1 finding
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • May 18, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Apr 29, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Feb 29, 2012—3 findings
  • Feb 1, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction