Roosevelt Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Communit
Muskegon, Michigan · CCN 235549
30 surveys since 2010, 26 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 229
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 26
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 39
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ATRIUM CENTERS
- County
- Muskegon
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 71 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Michigan.
Last survey on record
Apr 2, 2026
221 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.92 | 3.86 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.65 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.9% | 45.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G23.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2643.3% | E2135.0% | F1016.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C11.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6933×
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8813×
Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Roosevelt Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Communit, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Sep 13, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility licensed staff failed to follow professional standards of practice, monitor pertinent laboratory values, communicate effectively with a [CONDITION(S)] clinic and follow-up on pharmacy recommendations resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that was identified on 9/6/2022 and began on 2/8/2022 when the [CONDITION(S)] clinic discontinued testing PT/INR levels for Resident #26 who continued to receive [MEDICATION(S)] 6 mg (an anticoagulant) once a day at the facility for over 6 months without PT/INR monitoring. This deficient practice resulted in the high likelihood for Resident #26 to suffer an adverse drug reaction (hemorrhage or blood clot formation) that could result in serious harm, injury and/or death. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 18, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received comprehensive pain assessments for 1 resident (Resident #33) reviewed for quality of care, resulting in unidentified/untreated pain, unidentified fractures, and a delay in treatment and the potential for the worsening of medical conditions. Findings: Resident #33 (R33) Review of an Admission Record revealed R33 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: closed burst fracture of lumbar vertebra. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 18, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a post fall intervention for 1 resident (Resident #33), reviewed for falls, resulting in a subsequent fall with major injuries. Findings: Resident #33 (R33) Review of an Admission Record revealed R33 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: closed burst fracture of lumbar vertebra. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R33, with a reference date of 7/3/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R33 was moderately cognitively impaired. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Sep 13, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a wound for 1 Resident (Resident #332) reviewed for alterations in skin integrity, resulting in the development of a wound for R332 and the potential for further skin breakdown, delayed wound healing, infection, and overall deterioration in health status. Findings: Resident #332 (R332) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R332 was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656May 7, 2021
This citation pertains to intake MI 734 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive Care Plan for Falls to prevent a fall of a resident (Resident #14) that is at high risk for falls, resulting in a fall with fracture and the potential for all facility residents at risk for falls to not have Care Plan interventions implemented to prevent falls and injury. Findings include: Resident #14 admitted to the facility 2/12/21 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Read 46 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 46 of 229 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 2, 2026Standard and complaint18 findings
- Sep 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2025Standard17 findings
- Feb 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2024Standard12 findings
- Aug 18, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 13, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings · 2 harm
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- May 7, 2021Standard and complaint24 findings · 7 harm
- Jun 25, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 8, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 3, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Jul 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2019Standard11 findings · 3 harm
- Mar 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2018Standard and complaint15 findings · 3 harm
- Sep 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 25, 2017Standard12 findings
- Aug 17, 2016Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 7, 2015Standard11 findings
- Oct 17, 2014Standard8 findings
- Nov 1, 2013—12 findings
- Mar 20, 2013—2 findings
- Oct 26, 2012Standard8 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 5, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 13, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 6, 2012—12 findings
- Jun 15, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 21, 2011—17 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 1, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Majestic Care of Battle CreekBattle Creek6 harm findings
- Greentree of Hubbell Rehabilitation and HealthHubbell5 harm findings
- Marshall Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityMarshall4 harm findings
- Riverside Nursing CentreGrand Haven8 harm findings
- Allendale Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityAllendale15 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction