Deficiency Index

Rolling Green Village

Greenville, South Carolina · CCN 425160

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
37
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
22
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE SERVICES
County
Greenville
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 10, 2024

943 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.505.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.98—
Annual nurse turnover48.8%42.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E133.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 37 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rolling Green Village, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF700Feb 17, 2023

    Amended 04/05/23 Based on interview, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess 4 of 6 residents for side rails safety/entrapment hazards, obtain consent, or assess for less restrictive alternatives to side rails. Resident (R)4, who lacked side rail assessments or consent, was found dead on 02/13/2023 at approximately 7:45 AM. His body was found on the ground beside his bed while his head was between the mattress and 1/4 side rails. R3, R5, and R6 also lacked side rail documentation despite observed use of side rails. This was confirmed by interview with the Director of Nursing (DON). […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 17, 2023

    Based on review of the facility policy, record review, interviews, and photographic evidence, the facility failed to protect Resident (R)4 from accidents/accident hazards resulting in death. R4 was found dead on 02/13/23 at approximately 7:45 AM. Staff discovered him with his body on the floor and his head against the window-facing side rail. R4's head was caught in the side, while the side rail was pushed up against the resident's neck. On 02/16/23 at approximately 3 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF585Jul 8, 2022

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate and respond to resident grievances for 2 of 9 grievances reviewed for grievance resolution. The facility further failed to respond to concerns brought up during resident council meetings from January 2022 through July 2022. Specifically, the facility failed to resolve/respond to grievances/concerns related to lengthy call light response times, communication difficulties, wheelchair needs, activities of daily living (ADLs), noise levels, staff communication, staff being on their phones during ADL care, and unprofessional behavior. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Apr 10, 2024

    Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to report their five-day follow-up to the State Agency (SA) within five (5) days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Investigating Injuries and Reporting Injuries, with a revision date of December 2016 revealed, A facility shall submit a written report of its investigation of every serious accident and incident to the Department within five (5) days of the serious accident or incident. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Jul 8, 2022

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident, his or her family, and/or the resident representative (RR) was provided information related to the benefits and risks to the residents for prescribed [CONDITION(S)] medications. The facility further failed to obtain consents for the [CONDITION(S)] medications by the resident, or family, and/or the RR. This affected 3 of 5 residents (Resident (R) 21, R31, and R32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Lifestyle Support/Behavior Management Policy and Procedure, reviewed 06/21 indicated, If the resident is receiving a [CONDITION(S)] medication, the community will obtain consent for the medication. 1. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 17, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 8, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Dec 10, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Nov 14, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 18, 2019Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Apr 5, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Feb 9, 2017Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Apr 28, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Dec 31, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Apr 18, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 3, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction