Deficiency Index

Riverside Manor NRSG & Rehab CTR

Newcomerstown, Ohio · CCN 365429

20 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
87
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Tuscarawas · rural
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Apr 24, 2026

199 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.553.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover21.8%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2281.5%E13.7%F13.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.7%C13.7%
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 87 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8812×

    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Riverside Manor NRSG & Rehab CTR, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 24, 2026

    Based on record review, review of therapy records, review of the facility's investigation, review of employee conference reports, and interviews with resident(s), family, and staff, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely following physical therapy recommendations. This resulted in Actual harm on 04/12/26 when Resident #1 was improperly transferred resulting in a fractured arm. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and injuries.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility 05/06/25 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur, nondisplaced fracture of surgical neck of right humerus, anemia, orthopedic aftercare, restless legs,… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF926Jan 30, 2025

    Based on observation, interview with staff, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe and clean environment free from discarded cigarette butts in the resident smoking area. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 01/27/25 at 11:15 A.M. the resident smoking area with Housekeeper #201 revealed several cigarette butts on the concrete pad under the awning and in the stones by the building where the residents smoked. There were several leaves laying around the area which could catch on fire. Interview on 01/27/25 at 11:20 A.M. with Housekeeper #201 confirmed the cigarettes were not discarded properly in the fireproof container. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Aug 13, 2026

    Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to dispose of opened insulin pens in accordance with manufacturer instructions and failed to consistently monitor medication refrigerator temperatures. This affected 14 residents (#2, #3, #4, #7, #10, #24, #30, #31, #41, #46, #50, #54, #58, and #69) of 47 residents who resided on the 200, 300 and 400 hallways. The facility census was 63. Findings include:1.On 08/11/26 at 2:31 P.M., observations of the 400 hall medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) #138 revealed an opened humalog insulin pen for Resident #58 which was opened on 07/02/26. On 08/11/26 at 2:31 P.M., RN #138 verified Resident #58's humalog insulin pen had been opened 07/02/26 per the label. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Jun 30, 2022

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate. This affected four residents (#40, #6, #37, and #4) of four reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admitted [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated a wander/elopement alarm was not used and wandering was not exhibited. Review of the progress notes 05/13/22 at 2:04 P.M., 05/16/22 at 3:58 P.M., 05/17/22 at 3:40 P.M., 05/17/22 at 4:09 P.M., 05/18/22 at 4:13 P.M., and 05/18/22 at 9:42 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 13, 2021

    Based on Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, facility policy and procedure for employee screening, facility employee screening records, employee time punches and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 employee signs and symptoms screening protocols were properly implemented. This had the potential to affect seven residents (Resident #5, #12, #25, #39, #42, #44, and #50) residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 58. Finding include: Review of the COVID-19 staff screening logs revealed State Testing Nursing Assistant #301 was screened on 01/07/21 and she answered no to all the screening questions and her temperature was 97.3 Fahrenheit (F). On 01/09/21, STNA #301 answered yes to cough and shortness of breath and her temperature was 97.5 F. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 87 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 13, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Apr 24, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 4, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 30, 2025Standard14 findings
  • Mar 7, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Apr 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jan 13, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Dec 2, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Sep 4, 2019Complaint6 findings
  • Oct 4, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Aug 3, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jul 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 19, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2015Standard20 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 27, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 6, 2012—4 findings
  • Jul 21, 2011—1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction