Deficiency Index

Riveroaks Health Campus

Princeton, Indiana · CCN 155732

19 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
92
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
68
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES
County
Gibson · rural
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 38 government-run facilities of 66–99 beds in Indiana.

Last survey on record

Dec 22, 2025

322 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.273.52
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.27—
Annual nurse turnover36.4%41.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1575.0%E315.0%F15.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C15.0%
CMS’s current file: 20 of the 92 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8422×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6231×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Riveroaks Health Campus, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Oct 4, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure designation of a certified Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP had not received specialized training in infection prevention and control when starting as the IP. This had the potential to affect 56 of 56 residents residing in the facility. Finding includes: On 10/4/24 at 9:38 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated that she was currently responsible for the infection prevention and control program in the facility. She indicated she was able to dedicate approximately 5-10 hours per week on the infection control program. On 10/4/24 at 11:25 A.M., the ADON's employee record was reviewed. The ADON had begun the role as IP on 6/4/24, prior to obtaining her IP certification on 6/17/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Oct 4, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions). Signs were not posted, orders were not initiated, and gowns were not worn during high contact activities. (Resident T, Resident S, Resident D, Resident L, Resident W, Resident V) Findings included: 1. On 9/30/24 at 1:48 P.M., during a random observation there was no EBP sign on Resident L's door. On 10/1/24 at 9:00 A.M., during a random observation there was no EBP sign on Resident L's door. On 10/02/24 at 10:28 A.M., during a random observation there was no EBP sign on Resident L's door. On 10/2/24 at 10:11 A.M., Resident L's clinical record was reviewed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677May 17, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing and oral hygiene for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents did not receive a complete bed bath, shower, and/or daily oral hygiene according to the plan of care and residents preferences. (Resident F, Resident G, Resident H, Resident J) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 5/16/24 at 10:20 A.M., Resident F was sitting up in his room, dressed, with his hair combed back. His hair appeared to be oily. During record review on 5/16/24 at 11:00 A.M., Resident F's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, kidney failure, reduced mobility, and weakness. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725May 17, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided to maintain residents quality of life and to ensure residents' activities of daily living (ADL's) were completed for 2 of 2 days during the survey. Findings include: On 5/16/24 at 10:00 a.m., the Facility Census Form indicated there were 57 residents residing on the health center. 1. During the survey from 5/16/24 through 5/17/24, the following interviews were conducted. - The staff could use more help. - Call lights take a long time to be answered and it was frustrating. - Waiting 20 minutes for call lights to be answered. - The facility is short staffed. - It was difficult to complete tasks for residents due to staffing. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Dec 22, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified during a change in condition for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for closed records. (Resident 57)Finding includes: On 12/16/25 at 2:23 P.M., Resident 57's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 57 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/10/25, indicated Resident 57 was cognitively intact. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 92 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 22, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Oct 4, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
  • May 17, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Jan 8, 2020Standard7 findings
  • Dec 13, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Oct 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Oct 25, 2017Standard11 findings
  • Oct 24, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Aug 18, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Jun 17, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Apr 7, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2013—15 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 19, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2012—2 findings
  • Apr 13, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 21, 2011—1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction