Deficiency Index

River Valley Rehabilitation Center

Blountstown, Florida · CCN 105473

16 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
66
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
150
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS
County
Calhoun · rural
Medicare-certified since
1984

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 27, 2025

592 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.603.63
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover33.6%41.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 66 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at River Valley Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF565Mar 27, 2025

    Based upon observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to meet the requirements for resident council by not providing a private space for the resident council meetings. The findings include: An observation of the resident council meeting was made on 03/26/2025 at 11:00 AM. The meeting area designated by the facility was the dining room. Seven residents were in attendance for the meeting, including the resident council president and two staff members. Prior to the meeting beginning, the facility liaison, who is the Activities Director, asked what topics should be discussed and informed that she always conducts the meetings. The Activities Director was then asked to exit the meeting so they could discuss resident council topics without staff present. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Mar 27, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews and review of the maintenance request logs, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and safe home like environment for 3 of 24 rooms investigated for environment (Rooms 106, 114 & 212). The findings include: room [ROOM NUMBER] On 03/24/25 at approximately 1:39 PM and on 3/27/25 at approximately 1:33 PM, observations of the bathroom door in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed peeling wood at the base of the door and the door dragging and scratching the floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Mar 27, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide or offer adequate grooming of facial hair for 1 of 3 residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADL). (Resident #75) The findings include: Observations of Resident #75 were conducted on 3/26/25 at 10:24 AM and 3/27/25 at 10:35 AM. The resident was observed to have gray facial hair to her chin approximately 1/2 cm long in some areas. On 3/27/25 at 10:35 AM, the resident was asked if staff ever offer to remove her facial hair. She could not recall. A review of Resident #75's electronic medical record revealed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF732Mar 27, 2025

    Based upon observations and interviews, the facility failed to report nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift. The findings include: During observations of the nurse staffing data on 3/24/25, 3/25/25, and 3/27/25, it was observed that the facility had posted all staff for the entire day during the beginning of day shift, which included all staff for the day, evening, and night shifts. On 3/27/25 at approximately 02:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator and Regional Clinical Manager was conducted. They stated that they have always posted our nursing staffing data for a 24-hour period, then update it at the beginning of each shift and as needed when changes occur, such as call ins.

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 66 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 27, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Dec 5, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Feb 1, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Nov 2, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jun 22, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 15, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Aug 6, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jul 24, 2014Standard6 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • May 30, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 29, 2013—4 findings
  • Mar 6, 2013—2 findings
  • Dec 4, 2012—5 findings
  • Jul 27, 2012—9 findings
  • Jun 30, 2011—12 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction