River Valley Rehabilitation Center
Blountstown, Florida · CCN 105473
16 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 66
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 150
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS
- County
- Calhoun · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1984
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 27, 2025
592 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.60 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 33.6% | 41.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at River Valley Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF565Mar 27, 2025
Based upon observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to meet the requirements for resident council by not providing a private space for the resident council meetings. The findings include: An observation of the resident council meeting was made on 03/26/2025 at 11:00 AM. The meeting area designated by the facility was the dining room. Seven residents were in attendance for the meeting, including the resident council president and two staff members. Prior to the meeting beginning, the facility liaison, who is the Activities Director, asked what topics should be discussed and informed that she always conducts the meetings. The Activities Director was then asked to exit the meeting so they could discuss resident council topics without staff present. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Mar 27, 2025
Based on observations, interviews and review of the maintenance request logs, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and safe home like environment for 3 of 24 rooms investigated for environment (Rooms 106, 114 & 212). The findings include: room [ROOM NUMBER] On 03/24/25 at approximately 1:39 PM and on 3/27/25 at approximately 1:33 PM, observations of the bathroom door in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed peeling wood at the base of the door and the door dragging and scratching the floor. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Mar 27, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide or offer adequate grooming of facial hair for 1 of 3 residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADL). (Resident #75) The findings include: Observations of Resident #75 were conducted on 3/26/25 at 10:24 AM and 3/27/25 at 10:35 AM. The resident was observed to have gray facial hair to her chin approximately 1/2 cm long in some areas. On 3/27/25 at 10:35 AM, the resident was asked if staff ever offer to remove her facial hair. She could not recall. A review of Resident #75's electronic medical record revealed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF732Mar 27, 2025
Based upon observations and interviews, the facility failed to report nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift. The findings include: During observations of the nurse staffing data on 3/24/25, 3/25/25, and 3/27/25, it was observed that the facility had posted all staff for the entire day during the beginning of day shift, which included all staff for the day, evening, and night shifts. On 3/27/25 at approximately 02:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator and Regional Clinical Manager was conducted. They stated that they have always posted our nursing staffing data for a 24-hour period, then update it at the beginning of each shift and as needed when changes occur, such as call ins.
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 66 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 27, 2025Standard4 findings
- Dec 5, 2019Standard2 findings
- Feb 1, 2019Standard8 findings
- Nov 2, 2017Standard2 findings
- Jun 22, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 15, 2016Standard3 findings
- Aug 6, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jul 24, 2014Standard6 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- May 30, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Mar 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2013—2 findings
- Aug 29, 2013—4 findings
- Mar 6, 2013—2 findings
- Dec 4, 2012—5 findings
- Jul 27, 2012—9 findings
- Jun 30, 2011—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction