Deficiency Index

River Hills Village in Keokuk

Keokuk, Iowa · CCN 165396

23 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
92
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
84
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
UNLIMITED DEVELOPMENT, INC.
County
Lee · rural
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Iowa.

Last survey on record

Sep 18, 2025

417 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.283.54
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.40—
Annual nurse turnover40.0%44.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG112.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD562.5%E225.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 92 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6571×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6891×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8031×

    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at River Hills Village in Keokuk, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 16, 2024

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy, resident and staff interviews, and facility investigation documentation the facility failed to use the necessary transfer equipment when assisting a resident in the bathroom, resulting in a lower leg fracture for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 64 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessed the resident as dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and chair/bed to chair transfers. The MDS listed diagnoses included: stroke, arthritis, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the right side. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Sep 18, 2025

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff served the correct portion size to meet the nutritional needs of the 9 residents (Residents #2, #3, #13, #20, #28, #30, #36, #56, #62) with a mechanical soft or puree diet order for one of one meal service observation. The facility reported a census of 65 residentsFindings include: 1. During an observation on 9/16/2025 at 10:04 AM, observation of the lunch meal preparation for mechanical soft and pureed diets revealed the following: Staff N, Cook, placed eight servings, four ounces each serving, of beef pot roast into a machine that mechanically ground the meat and added beef broth. The total amount of ground meat measured seven cups. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 18, 2025

    Based on meal services observation, facility policy review, review of the Federal Food and Drug Administration Code, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff served food under sanitary conditions for one of one meal service observations. The facility reported a census of 65 residents.Findings include:During an observation on 9/16/25 at 11:49 AM, Staff N, Cook, uncovered the pans on the steam table in the memory care dining unit, gloved, uncovered plates, and served the lunch meal to residents in the memory care unit. At 12:02 PM, Staff N completed the lunch service in the memory care unit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF585Oct 13, 2022

    Based on interviews, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a system for filing and responding to grievances for 3 (Resident #22, Resident #38, and Resident #8) of 3 residents interviewed who were members of Resident Council. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. Findings included: A review of a facility policy and procedure titled, Grievances, revised on 06/01/2022, revealed, The Facility shall ensure that the resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Grievances shall be addressed by the facility and resolved in a timely manner. The procedure portion of the policy indicated, 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Jul 1, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for five out of seven residents reported during the Resident Council Meeting (Residents #8, #9, #17, #23, and #49), for one resident interviewed (Resident #3) and an observation of one resident who had a call light on for more than 15 minutes (Resident #29). The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 with the following Diagnoses: [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 92 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 18, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Sep 12, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 11, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 1, 2021Standard10 findings
  • Dec 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 15, 2020Complaint5 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Apr 18, 2019Standard and complaint9 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 3, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 19, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Dec 3, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Oct 30, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Sep 3, 2013—8 findings
  • Apr 11, 2013—3 findings
  • Oct 23, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 19, 2012—4 findings
  • Nov 29, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 12, 2011—1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2011—3 findings
  • May 5, 2011Standard9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction