Rio Grande Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
La Jara, Colorado · CCN 065399
22 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 142
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CENTENNIAL HEALTHCARE
- County
- Conejos · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2010
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 42 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Apr 22, 2026
201 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.48 | 3.60 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.9% | 46.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $54,946 across 2 penalties
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1948.7% | E1230.8% | F512.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5822×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6042×
Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
- F7582×
Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Rio Grande Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF690Nov 6, 2025
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#2) of seven residents reviewed for foley catheter care and catheter assessments out of eleven sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff were appropriately trained in the care needs of a resident with quadriplegia and effectively monitoring Resident #2, who had an indwelling foley catheter for signs and symptoms of urinary retention. This resulted in the resident being transferred to the hospital where she was admitted to the hospital's intensive care unit for a higher level of care. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Nov 6, 2025
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from abuse for one (#10) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 11 sample residents.Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of autistic disorder, dementia and depression.Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and schizophrenia (mental illness).On 9/7/25, Resident #10 entered the facility from outside. Resident #11 approached Resident #10 and pushed him to the floor. Resident #10 complained of left leg pain and was transferred to the hospital where he was diagnosed with a femur fracture that required surgical repair. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #10 from physical abuse by Resident #11.Findings include:I. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Nov 6, 2025
Based on , observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for two (#1 and #2) of five residents reviewed for wound care and weekly skin assessments out of 11 sample residents.Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of heart failure, multiple sclerosis, dementia and diabetes. Resident #1 had a history of hemorrhoids and was receiving as needed topical medication. Upon admission to the hospital on [DATE], it was discovered that Resident #1 had a perianal abscess which required surgery and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 1, 2021
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent neglect for one (#4) of three residents reviewed for injuries of nine sample residents. During Resident #4's rehabilitation stay, the resident suffered a hip dislocation of unknown origin. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation after surgery to his left hip. He had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive two-person assistance for care. Eighteen days later he was transferred to the hospital with the same hip having been dislocated. The facility stated the hip became dislocated due to his movement while in bed. The hospital records documented the cause of the dislocation was unknown. Hospital records further documented the resident had a pressure injury on his left heel. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 22, 2026
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure staff did not touch ready-to-eat food with their bare hands; -Ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene during meal service;-Ensure expired food was discarded;-Ensure equipment was in good repair; and,-Ensure artificial nails and jewelry were not worn. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure staff used proper hand hygiene and did not touch ready-to-eat foods with bare hands during meal service.A. […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 142 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2026Standard12 findings
- Nov 6, 2025Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Jul 24, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Mar 26, 2024Standard7 findings
- Jul 1, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Feb 1, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 20, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Apr 6, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 20, 2019Standard15 findings
- Feb 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 15, 2018Standard and complaint4 findings
- Aug 31, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 28, 2017Standard13 findings
- Feb 25, 2016Standard18 findings
- Dec 5, 2014Standard6 findings
- Nov 7, 2013—11 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 2, 2013—2 findings
- May 23, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 29, 2012—12 findings
- Jan 4, 2012—13 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2011—11 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction