Deficiency Index

Ridgeway Rehab Center

Catonsville, Maryland · CCN 215227

20 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
151
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
61
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Baltimore
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 17 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Feb 11, 2026

271 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.523.93
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.89—
Annual nurse turnover57.9%42.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$37,805 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4483.0%E815.1%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.9%C—
CMS’s current file: 53 of the 151 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ridgeway Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Feb 11, 2026

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure that a resident or their responsible party (RP) was offered the opportunity to develop an advanced directive, and 2) ensure two certificates of incapacity included a diagnosis or reason for the incapacity. These failures affected three residents (Resident #8, #10, and #15) out of a sample of three reviewed for advanced directives during the recertification/complaint survey. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655Feb 11, 2026

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure a resident had baseline care plan / care plans within the required timeframe and provided the resident and/or family with a copy of the care plans, and 2) provide evidence in the resident's medical record that this summary had been delivered. This was evident for Four (Resident #8, #9, #40, and #15) out of 18 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: A baseline care plan (BLCP) must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility. It must include initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Feb 11, 2026

    Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plan meetings were held concurrently with quarterly care plan revisions, and resident and/or their representatives were invited to care plan meetings. This deficiency affected six residents (Resident #5, #7, #9, #17, #40, and #51) of 6 residents reviewed for care planning during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Care plans serve as essential guides for the care residents receive within the facility. They must be developed within seven days of a resident's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least quarterly, or more frequently as necessitated by a change in condition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Nov 6, 2024

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to provide and maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment for the residents. This was found to be evident when observations were made during tours of the building during the facility's survey. The findings include the following: An entrance tour was conducted on 10/27/24 at 9:15 AM and the following concerns were identified: Room # 200 was observed with marring noted on the wall Room # 201 was observed with marring noted on the wall behind each bed and near the door Room # 203 was observed with marring noted on the side of the walls Room # 204 was observed with marring noted on the walls, and the floor was dirty with a dark substance noted throughout the room Room # 205 was observed with… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Nov 6, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident representative in writing of the reason for transfer to the hospital. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #55, # 37, # 41, #58) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization s during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) On 10/30/24 at 07:30 AM, review of Resident #55's medical record revealed he/she was hospitalized on [DATE] and 9/24/24. On 10/30/24 at 11:25 AM, an interview with the [NAME] President of sister company (Staff #21) revealed they are unable to provide a copy of the written transfer form from the 9/21/24 hospitalization . […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 151 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 11, 2026Standard18 findings
  • Oct 16, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 6, 2024Standard and complaint22 findings
  • Mar 26, 2021Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Dec 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 6, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2018Standard21 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Mar 23, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2017Standard14 findings
  • Jul 18, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Apr 16, 2015Standard3 findings
  • May 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Apr 22, 2013—4 findings
  • Jan 16, 2013—12 findings
  • Nov 17, 2011—5 findings
  • Jun 22, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 12, 2010—12 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction