Deficiency Index

Richmond Health Care Center

Richmond, Texas · CCN 676006

38 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
153
Surveys
38
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file32/38

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
92
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT
County
Fort Bend
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 17 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 10, 2025

487 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.664.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.44—
Annual nurse turnover65.5%44.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$78,036 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K14.3%L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1773.9%E28.7%F28.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C14.3%
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 153 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6552×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5671×

    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Richmond Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF755Nov 13, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures that assured the accurate administration of all drugs to meet the needs of each resident for 16 of 18 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, and Resident #16) reviewed for pharmacy services. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Nov 6, 2021

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 6 residents (CR #1) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to timely identify CR #1's change in condition of lethargy, impaired communication and motor functions. 2. The facility failed to timely assess, notify CR #1's physician, and provide interventions to CR #1 who began to have an increased altered mental state, lethargy and physical impairments. 3. The facility failed to timely address CR #1's increase in [CONDITION(S)] activity. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 11/3/21. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 7, 2026

    Based on, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse for 5 of 15 residents (Residents #9, #3, #5, #2 and CR #3) reviewed for abuse in that: 1. Resident #5 was physically abusive to Resident #9 on 7/22/26 when Resident $5 pushed Resident #9 to the ground and Resident #9 fell and hit her head, resulting in a 1.2 cm laceration. 2. Resident #5 was physically abusive to CR #3 on 6/24/26, when Resident #5 hit CR #3 causing CR #3 to put Resident #5 in a chokehold and they both fell to the floor. 3.Resident #2 was physically abusive to Resident #1 on 4/4/26 when Resident #2 hit Resident #1 on the left arm. These failures placed residents, who resided in the facility at risk of abuse, injuries, pain and emotional distress. The findings included:1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF755Jun 2, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's [MEDICATION(S)] medication was ordered from the pharmacy and received timely, as a result Resident #1's Tardive Dyskinesia worsened. This failure could place residents whose medications were supervised by the facility at risk of experiencing serious side effects from possible interruptions to their medication regimen. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF760Jun 2, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medications. Resident #1 experienced exacerbated symptoms of her illness with involuntary movements of her tongue and legs after she missed six doses of [MEDICATION(S)] medication because the facility failed to order it before it ran out. This failure placed all residents whose medications were supervised by the facility at risk of experiencing serious side effects from possible interruptions to their medication regimen. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 153 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 7, 2026Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Feb 9, 2024Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2023Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 8, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Jun 2, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Show the 30 earlier surveys
  • Apr 14, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Jan 28, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 17, 2020Standard11 findings
  • Oct 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 20, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • May 31, 2019Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Feb 6, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 13, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 27, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Feb 7, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard11 findings · 3 harm
  • Nov 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 24, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2015Complaint6 findings · 4 harm
  • Apr 16, 2015Standard13 findings
  • Mar 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 9, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 15, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Jul 11, 2013—1 finding
  • May 24, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2013—13 findings
  • Mar 20, 2013—2 findings
  • May 23, 2012—6 findings
  • May 5, 2011—10 findings
  • Dec 28, 2010—1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction