Deficiency Index

Reunion Plaza Healthcare & Rehabilitation

Tyler, Texas · CCN 675888

21 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
76
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
SOUTHWEST LTC
County
Smith
Medicare-certified since
2001

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 7, 2025

459 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.203.24
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—
Annual nurse turnover66.3%54.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD360.0%E240.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 76 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Reunion Plaza Healthcare & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Aug 7, 2025

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included but was not limited to, (i) A recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes, but was not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results; (ii) A final summary of the resident's status; (iii) Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter) for one (Resident #58) of four residents reviewed for discharge planning. 1. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary and a reconciliation of medications for Resident #58 for her unplanned discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #35 and Resident #25) of five residents, reviewed for infection control.1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene while bathing Resident #35. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #25.These failures placed residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections.Findings included: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF585Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify residents or their representatives on how to file a grievance in an anonymous manner, and the information of who the facility named as the Grievance Official for 2 residents (Resident #27 and Resident #43) out of 7 residents interviewed for grievances.1.The facility failed to notify Residents or their representatives either individually or through prominent postings throughout the facility on how to file a grievance or complaint in an anonymous manner. 2.The facility failed to follow their grievance policy by providing the correct information as to who the facility identified as the Grievance Official for Resident #27 and Resident #43. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for one (Resident #35) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A thoroughly cleaned the vaginal area and feet of Resident #35 when he provided the resident with a bath on 08/05/25. This failure could place residents at risk for a skin breakdown and infection.Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #35's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 05/18/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's medical records contained the results of the preadmission PASRR Level 1 screening and subsequent evaluations and determinations in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. This failure could place the residents at risk of not achieving their person-centered plan of care objectives and goals. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 76 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 7, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Mar 23, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Dec 17, 2020Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jul 3, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 6, 2019Standard5 findings
  • May 23, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Jun 28, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Jun 7, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Mar 29, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • May 4, 2016Standard and complaint5 findings
  • May 20, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 8, 2014Standard4 findings
  • May 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2013—7 findings
  • Jun 14, 2012—4 findings
  • May 6, 2011—7 findings
  • Mar 22, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction