Deficiency Index

Renaissance Park Multi Care Center

Fort Worth, Texas · CCN 455891

31 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
73
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 2 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
Tarrant
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 15, 2026

117 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.033.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.01—
Annual nurse turnover63.2%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$106,478 across 4 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.1%K26.3%L—
Actual harmG—H13.1%I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2062.5%E721.9%F13.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 32 of the 73 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6863×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Renaissance Park Multi Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Feb 28, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care, consistent with professional stands of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #95) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent Resident #95 from developing a stage 3 pressure injury to the sacral area. The facility did not assess Resident 95's skin to determine if she had pressure ulcers due to resdient refusal and did not identify a Stage III pressure ulcer to her sacrum which was identified when she was transferred to the hospital and was infected. Resident #95 was diagnosed with sepsis at the hospital. 2. The facility failed to accurately assess the skin of Resident #95. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Nov 9, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers that were avoidable for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1. The facility failed to perform weekly skin assessments for Resident #1 from 09/25/2023 to 10/07/2023. 2. The facility failed to notify the physician during the admission process of the resident's pressure ulcers to obtain wound treatments, and failed to obtain orders to help prevent facillity acquired pressure ulcers to develop. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Oct 3, 2024

    48520 Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 got his own medications instead of receiving Resident #2's medications, which included a narcotic medication, on [DATE] by MA D. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications, and reactions to increased dosages of medications or unfamiliar medications, including potentially death. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on [DATE], and ended on [DATE], as the facility had corrected the non-compliance by in-servicing all Medication Aides prior to the visit. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF925Apr 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for one (hallway 100) of two hallways checked for pest control, so that the facility was free of pests. The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure Residents #3, #4, and #2 were not bitten by horse flies and to ensure the facility was free of gnats and horse flies for Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4. This could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 30, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's kitchen, reviewed for food safety The facility failed to correctly seal a bag of opened cake mix. The facility failed to separate a dented can of food.The facility failed to label and date a package of opened pasta noodles.The facility failed to defrost frozen ground beef under running water. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.Findings included:Observation of the dry storage room in the kitchen on 04/28/2026 at 9:15 a.m. revealedA dented can of fresh vegetables stored on the rack with other cans.A package of previously opened cake mix in a storage bag exposed to air. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 73 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Jul 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 11, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 3, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 18, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Apr 18, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Nov 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 13, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jul 8, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Apr 6, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Apr 3, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 22, 2013—5 findings
  • Mar 22, 2012—4 findings
  • Mar 17, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction