Rehabilitation Center of Hampton

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rehabilitation Center of Hampton, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 16, 2024

  Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accidents and injuries for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for falls with injuries (Resident #1). Resident #1 experienced a fall from a full-body mechanical lift that resulted in a left arm injury. The facility failed to inspect a sling prior to transferring a resident with a mechanical lift which resulted in one strap breaking causing the resident to fall approximately 41 inches to the ground. While in the hospital, three months after the fall, an X-Ray revealed a fracture to her left proximal humerus (break in the upper part of the left bone of the arm near the shoulder). […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF925Nov 19, 2025

  Based on observation, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pest for 6 of 6 residents reviewed. (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #60. The facility identified a census of 44 residents.Finding include:1 The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating no cognitive impairment for decision making abilities and is able to make self-understood and understands others.Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented resident resided in room [ROOM NUMBER].On 11/19/25 at 1:20 PM, Resident #1 stated that he was in room [ROOM NUMBER] and it was awful with flies, and then he was moved to… […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578May 28, 2026

  Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff and family interviews, the facility failed to have a clear and accurate code status across all documentation records for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives (Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 39 residents.Findings include:Resident #34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severely impaired cognition. The Care Plan Focus initiated [DATE] listed Resident #34's Advanced Directives Status - Pursuant to resident rights, personal choices, and their desire to retain control over their health decisions, Resident #34's Representative chose Full Code. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Nov 18, 2025

  Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately implement interventions to protect 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed from financial exploitation. The facility reported a census of 45 residents.The facility corrected the noncompliance prior to the start of the survey by conducting staff in-services on 6/12/25, 6/16/25, and 6/17/25 regarding accepting gifts or payments from the residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented diagnoses of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 22, 2025

  Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices during urinary catheter care and wound care for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #14 and #32). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) didn't get completed as Resident #14 is rarely/never understood. The MDS listed Resident #14 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The MDS included diagnoses of medically complex conditions, neurogenic bladder (impaired bladder control), and diabetes mellitus. The Care Plan with a target date of 7/22/25 included the following Focuses: a. […]