Regent Park Care Center
Holyoke, Colorado · CCN 065302
13 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 52
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 51
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- VIVAGE SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Phillips · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 4, 2026
250 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.33 | 3.60 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.28 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 25.9% | 46.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,837 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G120.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D360.0% | E120.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Regent Park Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Mar 4, 2026
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#4, #8, #9 and #10) of six residents out of 10 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutrition needs to maintain their highest level of physical well-being.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4, Resident #8, Resident #9 and Resident #10's weights were documented accurately, which resulted in the residents experiencing severe weight loss.Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was identified as having a nutritional problem related to a decreased ability to feed herself due to dementia and visual and cognitive deficits. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Nov 7, 2024
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards in one of one medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Maintain the emergency medication kit with medications that had not expired; and, -Ensure the emergency medication kit did not have two different expiration dates on individual packages which were prepared by the pharmacy. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Medication Labeling and Storage policy, revised February 2023, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 11/6/24 at 3:35 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Jul 21, 2022
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to formulate advance directives for four (#1, #2, #3, and #4) out of six sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -The medical orders for scope and treatment (MOST) forms were completed accurately and thoroughly for Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4; and, -The legal paperwork for the resident's power of attorney was in the record for Resident #4. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Colorado Advance Directives Consortium, Guidance for Health Care Professionals website, dated [DATE], retrieved on [DATE] from http://www.coloradoadvancedirectives.com/wp-content/uploads/[DATE]-MOST-Booklet-REV-2015.pdf read in pertinent part, If the individual resides in a nursing facility,… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Jul 21, 2022
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical records were kept in a secure and confidential manner and the medical record was complete and accurate in keeping with accepted standards of practice for four (#2, #3, #4 and #5) out of six sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Laboratory results were in the medical record for Resident #2; -Ensure there was not missing documentation in the resident's record for Resident #4, #5 and #3; and, -Ensure resident's records were not accessible to others not authorized to view that information. Findings include: I. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF602Mar 4, 2026
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect one (#2) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of property out of 10 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2's recliner lift chair, purchased with funds from the resident' personal funds account, was delivered to and was kept in Resident #2's room.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse policy, revised 9/4/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/4/26 at 3:06 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 52 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 4, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 7, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
- Jun 21, 2023Standard1 finding
- Jul 21, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Sep 21, 2018Standard1 finding
- Jul 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 23, 2017Standard11 findings
- Jan 29, 2016Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Sep 9, 2015Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 26, 2014Standard9 findings
- Nov 7, 2013—3 findings
- Nov 15, 2012—10 findings
- Oct 5, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction