Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing Center
Wenatchee, Washington · CCN 505382
30 surveys since 2010, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 133
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 55
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT
- County
- Chelan
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Mar 13, 2026
241 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.46 | 3.93 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.67 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.0% | 43.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $10,358 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2369.7% | E927.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5852×
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
- F6282×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
- F6452×
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Regency Wenatchee Rehabiliation & Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 6, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the risks and initiate interventions to prevent further accidents for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 35 and 11) reviewed for accidents. Resident 35 experienced harm when hot soup was served on the overbed table and when the resident went to pull the tray closer to them to be within reach, the soup spilt onto their lap causing a third-degree burn to the left thigh. In addition, the facility failed to provide consistent supervision, thoroughly investigate the cause of falls, and ensure interventions were put into place to prevent further falls for Resident 11. These failures placed the residents at risk for injury and/or medical complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF677May 17, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to nail care for one of six residents (#1) reviewed for ADL care. Failure to provide the resident who was dependent on staff for toenail and fingernail care caused harm by allowing the nails to grow so long they dug into the resident's skin causing skin breakdown and pain. Findings included . Resident #1. Per review of the medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628May 6, 2025
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow up on written notices of bed holds (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) given at the time of hospital transfers, and/or failed to send a copy of the notice of transfers to the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a person that advocates for residents in nursing homes) for four of four residents (Residents 35, 14, 51 and 49) reviewed for discharge process. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655May 6, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan [(BCP) a document outlining initial care goals and necessary healthcare information for a resident], within 48 hours of admission, that included the minimum requirements of resident specific goals, physician orders, dietary orders, treatment plans, and social service needs for 6 of 10 residents (Residents 39, 13, 202, 33, 41, and 32) reviewed for new admissions (residents admitted to the facility in the last 30 days). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF849May 6, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a designated interdisciplinary [(IDT) a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines to help people receive the care they need] team member, appointed as the responsible party for coordinating care and communication with hospice, and implement the written agreement that ensured effective communication, collaboration, and coordination of care between the facility and the hospice (a specialized type of care focused on providing comfort and support to individuals nearing the end of life) provider for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 39 and 45) reviewed for hospice services. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services at end-of-life. Findings included . […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 133 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 13, 2026Standard2 findings
- May 6, 2025Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 2, 2024Standard and complaint19 findings
- Mar 1, 2023Standard6 findings
- Jun 23, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 24, 2020Infection control3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Mar 19, 2020Standard6 findings
- Feb 6, 2019Standard2 findings
- Dec 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 10, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 7, 2018Standard6 findings
- Dec 6, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 26, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jan 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 11, 2015Standard3 findings
- Nov 7, 2014Complaint3 findings
- Apr 24, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jan 17, 2014—2 findings
- Aug 2, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 5, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 8, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 6, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
- May 22, 2012—4 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 21, 2011—28 findings · 4 harm
- Oct 21, 2011—5 findings
- May 13, 2011—4 findings
- Nov 5, 2010—7 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction