Deficiency Index

Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent

Prineville, Oregon · CCN 385261

13 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
65
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
44
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
REGENCY PACIFIC MANAGEMENT
County
Crook
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 16, 2026

297 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.625.00
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.64—
Annual nurse turnover51.1%48.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD787.5%E—F112.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 65 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5761×

    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6361×

    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Regency Prineville Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF576Aug 16, 2024

    Based on interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident council. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely written communication. Findings include: During the resident council meeting on 8/14/24 at 2:30 PM residents stated their mail was not delivered to them on Saturdays. On 8/15/24 at 2:12 PM Staff 3 (Activities Director) stated mail was delivered to the facility Monday through Saturday, and she passed out mail to the residents Monday through Friday. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jan 16, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure supervision and safety interventions were in place for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#2) reviewed for smoking safety. This placed residents at risk smoking related injuries. Findings include:The facility's 4/2018 Smoking Policy indicated the following:-Residents were able to smoke tobacco only in designated areas on the premises.-If the facility had supervised smoking, times would be posted on the facility's nursing units and provided for residents who smoke. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684May 13, 2025

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for medication. This placed residents at risk for behaviors. Findings include: Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including depressive disorder. The 12/27/24 physician order indicated Resident 1 was to receive Zyprexa (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg at bedtime. The 12/2024 MAR indicated Resident 1 did not start taking Zyprexa until 12/31/24. On 5/13/25 at 12:08 PM Witness 2 (Pharmacy Technician) stated the pharmacy did not receive an order for Zyprexa until 12/31/24. On 5/13/25 at 1:19 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Resident 1 had an order for Zyprexa on 12/27/25 and the order was not implemented until 12/31/24 (4 days later).

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Aug 16, 2024

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician's orders for blood sugar parameters for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at increased risk for hyperglycemia. Findings include: Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2017 with diagnoses including diabetes. A 6/23/23 physician order indicated Resident 6's insulin aspart 100 units before meals parameters to hold for blood sugar less than 120. A review of Resident 6's MAR revealed the following: -On 5/8/24 a blood sugar of 143 at 7:00 AM and the insulin aspart was withheld by Staff 4 (LPN). -On 5/11/24 a blood sugar of 148 at 7:00 AM and the insulin aspart was withheld by Staff 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578May 19, 2023

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up on advance directives for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 12, 13 and 20) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for receiving care in conflict with their health care wishes. Findings include: A 5/2023 review of Resident 12, 13 and 20's clinical records revealed the residents did not have advance directives, but information was provided. There was no additional information to indicate whether the residents or their representatives executed an advance directive or declined to do so. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 65 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 16, 2026Standard1 finding
  • May 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2024Standard2 findings
  • May 19, 2023Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Mar 22, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Nov 3, 2017Standard16 findings
  • Sep 23, 2016Standard11 findings
  • May 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Aug 7, 2015Standard5 findings
  • May 22, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Nov 9, 2012Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 29, 2011—6 findings
  • Mar 24, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction