Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll
Carroll, Iowa · CCN 165231
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 52
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 46
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CAMPBELL STREET SERVICES
- County
- Carroll · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Aug 4, 2025
462 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.48 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G111.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D777.8% | E111.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6841×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F7261×
Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
- F7321×
Post nurse staffing information every day.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Regency Park Nursing & Rehab Center of Carroll, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF658Aug 27, 2024
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, hospital record review and policy review the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #1). The facility failed to obtain a urinalysis (UA) per Physician order in a timely manner which resulted in Resident #1 being transferred to the hospital and dying due to septic shock (bacterial infection that causes low blood pressure and organ failure) and urosepsis (untreated urinary tract infection (UTI) that spreads to the kidneys and causes sepsis). The facility received an order to obtain a UA on 8/12 and did not obtain the UA until 8/16. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF726Jul 10, 2023
Based on staff interviews, facility document review and personnel file review the facility failed to provide adequate staff for the overnight shift. Several overnight staff personnel were found to be sleeping while on duty. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: On 7/5/23 at 12:30 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), Staff I, stated that in November of 2022 she worked several times with CNA Staff F on the overnight shift and Staff F would come to work very confused, out of it and often fell asleep while on duty. Staff I stated she had seen Staff F so confused that she couldn't remember how to use the Hoyer mechanical lift. Staff I stated the Director of Nursing (DON) had been notified about the concerns. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Aug 4, 2025
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to provide dignity to 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) reviewed. The facility failed to provide dignity to the residents as demonstrated by residents stating they felt their care was rough due to the speed in which their care was provided. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, dated 6/1/25, identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating normal cognition. The resident had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, and other specified disorders of bone, ankle, and foot. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Oct 31, 2024
Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, CDC recommendations and policy review, the facility staff failed to follow transmission based precautions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #34) The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment had not been completed due to Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of facility fax dated 10/25/24 revealed Resident #34 had a productive cough with thick yellow sputum. Lung sounds diminished with rub noted on expiratory in the lower lobe. New orders from the physician included lab work and swab for influenza and Covid. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF881Oct 31, 2024
Based on facility policy review, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility failed to follow an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 resident (Resident #3). The facility failed to follow up on a urine culture. The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented diagnosis of urinary tract infection, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 52 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2024Standard2 findings
- Aug 27, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 24, 2023Standard3 findings
- Jul 10, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jun 29, 2022Standard4 findings
- Oct 27, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 18, 2019Standard4 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Sep 25, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Apr 12, 2018Standard and complaint2 findings
- Jan 12, 2017Standard1 finding
- Jan 21, 2016Standard8 findings
- Jul 27, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jan 22, 2015Standard3 findings
- Nov 21, 2013—4 findings
- Sep 13, 2012—3 findings
- Aug 25, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction