Regency House
San Angelo, Texas · CCN 675767
31 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 88
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CARADAY HEALTHCARE
- County
- Tom Green
- Medicare-certified since
- 1998
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jan 28, 2026
285 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.27 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.3% | 54.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D628.6% | E1152.4% | F314.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B14.8% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6902×
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Regency House, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 19, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure the Food Supervisor (FS) was wear a mustache guard while there was uncovered food in the kitchen. This deficient practice could place residents who consumed meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: During an observation and interview on 09/17/24 at 09:32 AM, the FS was noted to have a mustache and not covered with a hair restraint. The FS was leaning over some uncovered pots that contained food and were on the stove top. The FS was asked about his mustache and if he ever covered it,. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF908Sep 19, 2024
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure one of six stove top burners ignited automatically. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses and potential for injury to residents and staff. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 09/17/24 at 09:30 AM, the stove in the kitchen was inspected. One of the six burners was noted to turn not turn on when the knob was turned to on by [NAME] D. [NAME] D said she had to use a lighter to turn that burner on as it did not turn on automatically like the other five burners. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 27, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure that expired foods were discarded. This failure could affect residents who received meals prepared meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. The findings included: Observation on [DATE] at 10:15 AM, of the kitchen dry storage room revealed: 9, 14-ounce cans of Sweetened Condensed Milk with an expiration date of [DATE]. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:45 AM, the Dietary Manager was advised of the expired food items found during the initial inspection of the kitchen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF698Jan 28, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and #3) reviewed for dialysis services. The facility failed to ensure the dialysis communication forms were completed to include the pre and post dialysis assessment for Resident #1 and Resident #3. The facility failed to ensure residents had a physician order for dialysis treatment and to inspect vascular access sites for Resident #1 and Resident #3. The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Resident #1 and Resident #3 to address their dialysis needs. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Dec 18, 2025
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment which were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 20 residents (Resident #5, Resident #41, Resident #76) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #5's diagnosis of bilateral presbycusis (hearing loss, in both ears, related to damage of the inner ear that develops gradually as you get… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 88 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 18, 2025Standard5 findings
- Sep 19, 2024Standard7 findings
- Mar 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 27, 2023Complaint5 findings
- May 26, 2022Standard2 findings
- Jan 9, 2020Standard3 findings
- Jun 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- May 21, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 25, 2019Standard3 findings
- Aug 9, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Apr 23, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jan 5, 2018Standard2 findings
- Dec 14, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 21, 2016Standard2 findings
- Apr 1, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Mar 4, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jan 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Sep 18, 2015Standard and complaint14 findings
- Jul 17, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Jul 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Oct 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Sep 12, 2014Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jun 18, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Aug 1, 2013—3 findings
- Aug 15, 2012—2 findings
- Mar 6, 2012—2 findings
- Jul 29, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction