Regalcare at Greenfield
Greenfield, Massachusetts · CCN 225335
15 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 47
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- REGALCARE
- County
- Franklin · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Apr 22, 2026
201 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.24 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.27 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.5% | 40.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1659.3% | E622.2% | F27.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.7% | C27.4% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Regalcare at Greenfield, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Apr 22, 2026
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests, placing residents at risk for food, beverage and wound contamination. Specifically, the facility failed to repair/replace grout and tiles in the main kitchen dishwasher area, as initially recommended by the pest company in March 2023 [sic], and reviewed again in October 2025, January 2026, February 2026, and March 2026, resulting in an unresolved flying pests' presence and an optimal, ongoing area for flying pests to eat and breed. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF926Nov 21, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their smoking policy addressed what preventative measures were in place in the event of a fire emergency for one Resident (#8) out of one applicable resident. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure fire prevention equipment was readily available in the smoking area to ensure a safe smoking environment. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled Smoking, revised 3/2022, indicated the following: -Smoking is only permitted in designated resident smoking areas, which are located outside of the building. -Metal containers, with self-closing cover devices, are available in smoking areas. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF636Apr 22, 2026
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments in the timeframe specified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for six Residents (#5, #133, #82, #98, #122 and #9) out of a total sample of 24 residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that:1.annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed for Residents #5, #133, #82 and #98 no later than 14 days after the MDS assessment reference dates (ARDs).2. significant change in status assessments (SCSAs) were completed for Residents #122 and #9 no later than 14 days after determination that significant change in the Residents' status occurred, resulting in both Residents being admitted to hospice services. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF638Apr 22, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete non-comprehensive quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the timeframe specified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual for six Residents (#34, #115, #3, #124, #138, and #105) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to complete non-comprehensive quarterly MDS Assessments for Residents #34, #115, #3, #124, #138, and #105 no later than 14 days following the assessment reference date (ARD). Findings include: Review of CMS' RAI Manual, dated October 2025, indicated non-comprehensive quarterly assessments are required to be completed no later than 14 calendar days following the ARD (ARD plus 14 calendar days). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 22, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food storage and environmental cleaning of the facility's main kitchen, placing the facility residents at risk of contamination and foodborne illnesses.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that:-food items were properly dated, stored, and/or discarded timely in the main kitchen.-clean and sanitary surfaces were maintained in the food preparation areas. Findings include: Review of the Food Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2017 (www.fda.gov), indicated the following: -Food Preparation: >During preparation, unpackaged food shall be protected from environmental sources of contamination. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 47 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 22, 2026Standard9 findings
- Jan 28, 2025Standard4 findings
- Dec 4, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Nov 21, 2023Standard6 findings
- Nov 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 2, 2022Standard5 findings
- Dec 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 11, 2019Standard1 finding
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Sep 27, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 6, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jun 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2016Standard5 findings
- May 12, 2014Standard2 findings
- Apr 5, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 14, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Port Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNewburyport1 harm finding
- Royal Nursing Center, LLCFalmouth1 harm finding
- Ledgewood Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterBeverly2 harm findings
- Sippican Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterMarion2 harm findings
- Life Care Center of Nashoba ValleyLittletonno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction