Deficiency Index

Reformed Church Home

Old Bridge, New Jersey · CCN 315417

11 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
23
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
108
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 27, 2026

196 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.754.21
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.30—
Annual nurse turnover33.3%34.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD990.0%E—F110.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 23 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Reformed Church Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 27, 2026

    Based on observations, interview, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices to prevent the development of food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 4/21/26 at 9:50 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed a stainless steel utility rack with stacked pans on each shelf, all turned upside-down. The FSD identified this as the pan rack. The surveyor observed the following:1. Eleven pans stacked together on the second shelf from the top. The FSD identified these as 2-inch full size pans. The FSD separated the 2nd and 3rd pans in the stack which revealed they were dripping a clear thin liquid. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF607Apr 27, 2026

    Based on interviews, review of the facility's policy, and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to complete a background check for 1 out of 48 employees (Employee #1). This deficient practice was identified for newly hired employees reviewed since last survey of 12/11/24. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 4/21/26 at approximately 10:16 AM, during the entrance conference, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), all newly hired employee files for active and inactive employees from 12/11/24 to the current date.A review of the employee personnel files revealed the following:For Employee #1, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Apr 27, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure professional standards of nursing practice were followed by offloading (use of a device or specialized surface to decrease the risk of pressure injury) a resident's heels according to the physician's order. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for prevention of pressure injury and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Apr 27, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure professional standards of nursing practice were followed by administering oxygen therapy according to the physician's order. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #52) reviewed for respiratory care and was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Dec 11, 2024

    Complaint # NJ 179632 Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow fall prevention interventions as written on the resident's individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 44) reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/04/24 at 12:30 PM, during the initial tour of the 1st floor unit, the surveyor observed Resident #44 in a reclining chair in the day room with other residents and staff members. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 23 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 27, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Dec 11, 2024Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Aug 17, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Jul 30, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Nov 13, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jul 11, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Sep 2, 2016Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Aug 10, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jan 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2012—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction